Skip to main content

Security report for houseoftest.se

House of Test · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

House of Test is a Swedish consulting company specializing in software testing and quality assurance services, with offices in Lund, Göteborg, and Linköping. Established in 2008, the company positions itself as a trusted partner delivering measurable value and sustainable product quality. Their key services include leadership, requirements management, testing, QA, development, and DevOps, targeting organizations seeking to improve software quality and development efficiency. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on Webflow, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection, alongside a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound platform supporting the company's business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching houseoftest.se

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

House of Test operates in the technology sector, focusing on software testing and quality assurance consulting. Their business model revolves around providing expert consulting services to improve clients' software development processes and product quality. The company has a solid market position in Sweden, supported by reputable clients such as Sharkmob, Volvo, Assa Abloy, and Bosch, indicating strong industry trust. Their partnership ecosystem includes Flow Intelligence, suggesting collaboration with complementary service providers. The company targets corporate clients needing specialized QA and testing expertise, leveraging a content-rich website with insights and guides to attract and educate potential customers. Growth indicators include active content marketing, client testimonials, and a clear career section aimed at attracting talent. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the public site suggests a controlled lead generation approach via forms and social media.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism, supporting GDPR compliance. Security headers are partially present or implied but could be explicitly enhanced with additional headers like Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by formalizing policies and expanding header coverage.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy to enhance browser security.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
House of Test
Description
House of Test är ett specialiserat konsultbolag som tillhandahåller tjänster inom mjukvarutesting och QA. Kontor finns i Lund, Göteborg och Linköping.
Key services
Ledning (Leadership), Krav (Requirements Management), Test (Software Testing), QA (Quality Assurance), Utveckling (Development), DevOps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Inter, Bungee Shade)
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Use of secure third-party analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on software testing and quality assurance consulting.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  5. Use of multiple reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No contact phone numbers or emails explicitly listed on homepage; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, and various analytics and marketing scripts. Performance is optimized with CDN hosting and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of Google Tag Manager centralizes analytics management. Form handling is done via HubSpot forms with integrated Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for spam protection. The technical implementation is modern and well-structured, supporting a positive user experience and business goals. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation to further strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with houseoftest.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review houseoftest.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.