Skip to main content

Security report for host.ee

eHost OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eHost OÜ operates the website host.ee, providing domain registration, web hosting, and VPS cloud server services primarily targeting customers in Estonia. The company positions itself as a local technology service provider with a focus on affordable and secure hosting solutions. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, supporting multiple languages to cater to a diverse audience. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and WHMCS for service management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and infrastructure quality. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and some security best practices observed, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching host.ee

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eHost OÜ is a small-sized technology company founded in 2019, focusing on domain registration and hosting services in Estonia. Their business model revolves around providing essential internet infrastructure services to individuals and businesses. The company leverages partnerships with Cloudflare for DNS and uses WHMCS for customer and billing management. The website content and structure suggest a customer-centric approach with live chat support and multilingual capabilities. Revenue streams likely include domain sales, shared hosting, and VPS subscriptions. The company maintains a consistent brand image and targets a regional market with competitive pricing. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified in the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare DNS usage, which enhances resilience against DNS attacks and improves performance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting comprehensive security headers, formal policies, and user consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add explicit incident response and security contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eHost OÜ
Description
Kasuta meie teenuseid, et suunata internet sinu eesmärkide teenistusse. Registreerime sulle sobiva domeeni ning pakume taskukohaseid ja turvalisi servereid, mis vastavad kõikidele sinu vajadustele.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, VPS cloud servers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WHMCS, Chatstack Live Chat, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • CSRF token present in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized primarily in Estonian with multiple language options
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content
  3. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools without visible consent mechanisms
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet
  5. Use of Cloudflare DNS suggests some level of security and performance optimization
  6. Live chat integration present for customer support
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Cloudflare DNS for DNS management and protection, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and analytics, and WHMCS as a CMS and billing platform. The site is mobile optimized and supports multiple languages, indicating a focus on accessibility and internationalization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of minified CSS and JS files. However, some technical improvements are possible in accessibility and SEO. The infrastructure appears stable and professionally managed, but the lack of explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation suggests areas for technical enhancement to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with host.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review host.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.