Skip to main content

Security report for hi-jena.de

Helmholtz-Institut Jena · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Helmholtz-Institut Jena website represents a reputable scientific research institute affiliated with the GSI Helmholtzzentrum and the Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft. The institute focuses on advanced research in high-power lasers and particle accelerators, supporting major scientific projects such as FAIR and DESY. The website content is well-structured, professionally presented, and targets academic and scientific audiences including researchers and students. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is adequate with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy present, but lacking an explicit cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and aligned with its institutional mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hi-jena.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hi-jena.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hi-jena.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Helmholtz-Institut Jena operates as an important research entity within the German scientific ecosystem, collaborating with major Helmholtz centers and universities. Its business model is publicly funded research and education, with a focus on laser and particle physics. The institute's market position is strong within the academic and scientific community, supported by partnerships and affiliations with GSI and Helmholtz. The website reflects this positioning with detailed information on research groups, projects, and educational offerings. Growth indicators include active event listings and news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes GSI, DESY, HZDR, and regional government initiatives. The institute's operations emphasize collaboration, innovation, and scientific excellence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and published security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The absence of tracking and advertising scripts reduces privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and formalizing incident response communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with contact information for reporting security issues.
  4. Include clear contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve user trust and communication.
  5. Consider adding terms of service or user agreements to clarify website usage and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Helmholtz-Institut Jena
Description
Das Helmholtz-Institut Jena ist eine Außenstelle des GSI Helmholtzzentrums für Schwerionenforschung auf dem Campus der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena. Es fokussiert sich auf grundlegende und angewandte Forschung mit Hochleistungslasern und Teilchenbeschleunigeranlagen. Partnerinstitutionen sind die Helmholtzzentren DESY und HZDR. Das Institut unterstützt Forschungsziele von GSI/FAIR, DESY (mit FLASH) und XFEL und fördert die Kooperation zwischen Helmholtzzentren und Universität.
Key services
Forschung an Hochleistungslasern, Teilchenbeschleunigerforschung, Wissenschaftliche Kooperationen, Angebote für Studierende (Lehrveranstaltungen, Abschlussarbeiten)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Splide.js, glightbox, plyr
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL uses https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on scientific research and education.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact likely via contact page.
  4. No visible forms on the homepage; contact forms likely on dedicated contact page.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  6. No terms of service page found.
  7. Cookie policy present but no explicit consent mechanism detected.
  8. No security or incident response policies published on the site.
  9. Website uses modern CMS TYPO3 and common JS libraries.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system for academic and institutional websites. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Splide.js for carousels, glightbox for lightbox functionality, and plyr for media playback. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive CSS. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical URLs, and hreflang attributes for language variants. Accessibility is basic but present. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting details are not explicit but name servers indicate affiliation with German research networks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and appropriate for the institute's needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hi-jena.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hi-jena.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.