Skip to main content

Security report for hetjkc.nl

Het Jonge Kind Centrum · Education · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Het Jonge Kind Centrum is a specialized educational organization focused on the development of young children in childcare and early education settings in the Netherlands. The organization offers a range of training workshops and programs for pedagogical professionals and parents, emphasizing play as a core developmental method. The website reflects a well-established entity with a domain age consistent with its founding year of 2013, and it maintains an active presence on multiple social media platforms to engage its target audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates modern plugins such as LearnPress for course management and CleanTalk for anti-spam protection. The site employs Google Analytics and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, with privacy compliance mechanisms including a detailed cookie consent banner and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and employs anti-spam measures. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating a legitimate and consistent registration history. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture, good privacy compliance, and professional business credibility. Strategic recommendations include implementing additional security headers, enhancing accessibility, and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process to further strengthen trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hetjkc.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a niche educational service provider specializing in early childhood development and training for childcare professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized workshops, certifications like Babyclub® Excellente Beroepskracht, and tailored training offerings. The business model revolves around educational services and professional development, targeting childcare providers, pedagogical staff, and parents. The presence of structured data and active social media channels indicates a mature digital marketing approach. Growth indicators include a diverse workshop portfolio and engagement with professional networks. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with anonymized IP tracking in Google Analytics, and anti-spam protections are active via CleanTalk. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and GDPR compliant. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance documentation. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced security controls and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities from outdated software components.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Het Jonge Kind Centrum
Description
Het Jonge Kind Centrum (JKC) is dè specialist op het gebied van de ontwikkeling van jonge kinderen in de kinderopvang, van baby tot en met kleuters. Het centrum biedt educatieve dienstverlening aan kinderopvang, basisonderwijs onderbouw en ouders, met trainingen en workshops voor pedagogische medewerkers.
Key services
Training workshops for pedagogical staff, Educational programs for childcare and early education, Custom training and workshops, Video Interaction Coaching, Babyclub® professional certification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Enfold Theme, Google Analytics, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, LearnPress LMS, WP FullCalendar, jQuery, Moment.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CleanTalk anti-spam plugin
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and descriptions
  3. Active social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and theme
  6. Clear focus on education and training for early childhood professionals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme and several well-maintained plugins such as LearnPress for course management and WP FullCalendar for event scheduling. It integrates Google Analytics and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior insights, with anonymized IP tracking enabled. The site uses CleanTalk for anti-spam protection, indicating attention to security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Some technical debt is noted in the lack of explicit security headers and basic accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicit but likely involve Cloudflare CDN for performance and security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hetjkc.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hetjkc.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.