Skip to main content

Security report for herodotus.dev

Herodotus · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Herodotus is a technology company specializing in zero-knowledge infrastructure solutions for blockchain applications. Their offerings focus on enabling verifiable data, secure computation, and advanced scaling to support trust-minimized distributed applications. The website positions Herodotus as a niche player in the blockchain infrastructure space, targeting developers and organizations seeking advanced cryptographic solutions. The company demonstrates industry connections through partnerships with notable blockchain and technology firms such as Starkware and Snapshot. Technically, the website is built using Framer, with modern web technologies and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a professional user experience. However, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security incident response details, which are important for compliance and trust. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the website is credible and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching herodotus.dev

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention herodotus.dev, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for herodotus.dev right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Herodotus operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on blockchain zero-knowledge proof infrastructure. Their business model revolves around providing scalable and secure cryptographic infrastructure to blockchain developers and enterprises. The company leverages partnerships with established blockchain projects and technology providers to enhance credibility and market reach. The target customers are blockchain developers, startups, and enterprises requiring trust-minimized solutions. The website content and partner logos indicate a growing ecosystem and a focus on innovation in blockchain scalability and security. Revenue streams likely include infrastructure services and enterprise solutions. The company appears to be a small but specialized player with a clear niche focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. No critical security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the scripts. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and related regulations. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but requires enhancements in compliance and transparency to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Herodotus
Description
Herodotus offers cutting-edge zero-knowledge infrastructure for blockchains. Our solutions enable verifiable data, secure compute, and advanced scaling. Build trust-minimized applications with ease across distributed networks.
Key services
Zero-knowledge infrastructure, Verifiable data solutions, Secure compute, Advanced scaling for blockchains
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), Google Analytics, Google Fonts, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Framer events tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Framer
  2. Focus on zero-knowledge proof infrastructure for blockchain
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found
  5. Google Analytics used for tracking without visible cookie consent
  6. Trusted partner logos displayed indicating industry connections
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern web standards including responsive design and SVG graphics. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. Hosting appears to be via Framer's infrastructure (framerusercontent.com). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS other than Framer is detected. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a technology startup, but there is opportunity to improve security headers and privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with herodotus.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review herodotus.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.