Skip to main content

Security report for hawknetworks.net

Hawk Networks INC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hawk Networks INC operates a technology-focused website offering tools to transform connectivity through innovative routing and billing protocols. The company targets technology professionals and network builders aiming to build networks in challenging environments. The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing modern web technologies and standard tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. While the site demonstrates good design quality and mobile optimization, it lacks critical privacy and contact information, which impacts its overall trustworthiness. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Security measures are partially implemented with HTTPS and some script-level protections, but key security headers and policies are missing. Overall, the website presents a professional front but requires improvements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hawknetworks.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as an innovator in the technology sector, specifically in connectivity and network routing protocols. Its business model appears to focus on providing software tools and protocols for network building and billing. The target market includes technology professionals and organizations needing advanced connectivity solutions. The website content is consistent and professional, but the lack of detailed company information, contact details, and certifications limits the ability to fully assess business credibility. The use of Wix suggests a small to medium-sized operation with a focus on digital presence rather than extensive enterprise infrastructure. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes script-level security enhancements to restrict unauthorized cookie and header manipulations. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No visible privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, but no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline protections but missing comprehensive security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security HTTP headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and website components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hawk Networks INC
Description
Tools to transform connectivity. Build networks in even the most challenging environments with Althea's innovative routing and billing protocol.
Key services
routing protocol, billing protocol, network building tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Intl.Segmenter Polyfill, Core-js, Focus-within-polyfill
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security overrides on fetch and XHR to prevent unauthorized headers
  • Cookie handling restrictions for sensitive cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix technologies.
  2. No WHOIS data available indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No explicit contact information or security incident response details provided.
  5. Uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and tracking.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is technology and business focused.
  7. Security best practices partially implemented but missing key headers and policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Wix's Thunderbolt framework and leverages common polyfills and modern JavaScript libraries for compatibility and performance. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, typical for Wix-hosted sites. The absence of advanced SEO and accessibility features suggests room for technical improvement. Hosting is managed by Wix, providing reliable infrastructure but limiting customization. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hawknetworks.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hawknetworks.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.