Skip to main content

Security report for havis.com

Havis Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Havis Inc. is a well-established manufacturer specializing in rugged vehicle mounts, consoles, docking solutions, and transport solutions tailored for industries such as public safety, energy, healthcare, transportation, and retail. The company targets business clients requiring durable and secure technology mounting solutions for mobile and fixed environments. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information and industry-specific solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Lead Forensics. The site is secured with HTTPS and employs standard security headers, indicating a good security posture. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is found, which could be improved. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, though the absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern that should be monitored.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching havis.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Havis Inc. operates primarily in the B2B manufacturing sector, focusing on rugged technology solutions for various industries including government, transportation, energy, healthcare, and retail. Their broad industry coverage and extensive product catalog position them as a key player in the rugged mounting solutions market. The business model centers on product sales and technology enablement, targeting organizations that require secure and durable mounting and docking solutions. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and lead generation. The presence of social media links and comprehensive resource sections indicates active customer support and engagement strategies. The lack of visible WHOIS data is unusual but does not detract significantly from the company's apparent market presence and credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. The use of CAPTCHA on forms and secure form handling via Gravity Forms further enhances security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy and incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The integration of third-party scripts and tracking tools should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider implementing and publishing a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Havis Inc.
Description
Havis Inc. manufactures rugged vehicle mounts, consoles, docking solutions, and transport solutions designed for various industries including public safety, energy, healthcare, transportation, and retail.
Key services
In-vehicle consoles, Mounting solutions, Tablet and laptop docking, Transport solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lead Forensics, Gravity Forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA (reCAPTCHA)
  • Secure form handling via Gravity Forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lead Forensics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics
Marketing tools
Lead Forensics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. Comprehensive product and industry coverage indicating a mature business.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found on main pages.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear compliant.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It employs Bootstrap for responsive design and integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Lead Forensics for analytics and marketing. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses reCAPTCHA for form security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and to formalize security documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with havis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review havis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.