Skip to main content

Security report for harvard.edu

Harvard University · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Harvard University is a globally renowned educational institution dedicated to excellence in teaching, research, and leadership development. The website serves a diverse audience including prospective and current students, researchers, alumni, and the general public. It offers comprehensive information on degree programs, research initiatives, campus resources, and community engagement. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and rich in authoritative content, reflecting Harvard's prestigious market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yoast SEO Premium, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers could be improved. The absence of public WHOIS data is consistent with .edu domain policies and does not detract from the domain's legitimacy. The website maintains good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and digital maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, continuous monitoring of third-party scripts, and maintaining transparency in privacy and data protection practices to uphold trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching harvard.edu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Harvard University operates as a non-profit educational entity with a strong global brand and extensive academic offerings. Its business model focuses on education, research, and public service. The university leverages partnerships with affiliated schools and research institutes to expand its reach and impact. Revenue streams likely include tuition, grants, donations, and endowment income. The website reflects a well-established institution with a large enterprise scale, targeting students, academics, and global communities interested in higher education and research. The digital presence supports recruitment, engagement, and dissemination of scholarly work, reinforcing Harvard's competitive advantage in the education sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel is implemented asynchronously to minimize performance impact. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident and should be added to strengthen defenses against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not prominently available, suggesting an area for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced header policies and documented security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish clear security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Maintain and enhance privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  5. Continue investing in mobile optimization and accessibility to serve diverse user needs effectively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
President and Fellows of Harvard College
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Harvard University
Description
Harvard University is devoted to excellence in teaching, learning, and research, and to developing leaders who make a difference globally.
Key services
Undergraduate and graduate degree programs, Professional and lifelong learning, Research and scholarly work, Campus resources including libraries and museums, Online courses and educational content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Custom Search Engine, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO Premium, WordPress CMS, Jetpack Sharing Buttons, Google Adsense
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained academic institution site.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and focused on genetics and related research.
  3. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No public WHOIS data due to .edu domain policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with integrations of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yoast SEO Premium plugin, indicating a modern and well-supported technology stack. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. DNS and hosting details are not explicitly available, but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and third-party scripts. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation could be improved to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100 +2Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 65/100 +4Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 61/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with harvard.edu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review harvard.edu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.