Skip to main content

Security report for hakeris.lv

Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website hakeris.lv serves as a free, Latvian-language educational resource aimed at beginners interested in learning legal hacking and cybersecurity. It provides practical advice, curated links to reputable external platforms such as TryHackMe and Hack The Box, and guidance on certifications and career paths. The content is well-structured and relevant to its target audience, focusing on legal and ethical hacking practices. Technically, the site is simple, built with basic HTML and CSS, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, which limits its compliance posture. No forms or tracking technologies are present, indicating minimal data collection and user tracking. The WHOIS data is incomplete but consistent with a small personal or educational site registered in Latvia. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and provides valuable educational content but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hakeris.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hakeris.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hakeris.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hakeris.lv occupies a niche educational position within the Latvian cybersecurity community, targeting beginners interested in legal hacking. Its business model is informational, relying on free content and links to external paid services. The site does not appear to generate direct revenue or collect user data. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content in Latvian, which is scarce in this domain. The absence of contact information and formal business details suggests it is likely operated by an individual or small group rather than a formal company. The site’s partnership ecosystem is limited to external cybersecurity platforms referenced in the content. Growth potential depends on expanding content and possibly adding interactive features or community engagement.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is basic. It uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. There are no forms or inputs, reducing attack surface, but also no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard security headers, privacy policies, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Provide contact information or a contact form to improve business credibility and enable incident reporting.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security communication.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information to ensure completeness and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Praktisks un bezmaksas ceļvedis kā kļūt par hakeri legālā veidā. Resursi, padomi un atbildes uz biežākajiem jautājumiem kiberdrošībā.
Key services
Educational content about legal hacking, Links to external hacking training platforms, Advice on certifications and career paths
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple, well-structured educational guide in Latvian about legal hacking.
  2. No contact or privacy policies found, which reduces compliance posture.
  3. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  4. No scripts or external libraries detected in the HTML head.
  5. No social media or company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  6. External links point to reputable cybersecurity training and certification sites.
  7. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  8. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data is incomplete but consistent with a small personal or educational site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with simple HTML and CSS without detectable use of CMS or JavaScript frameworks. It has a clean, readable design optimized for desktop with basic mobile responsiveness. No external scripts or analytics tools are used, which reduces privacy concerns but limits insights into user behavior. Performance is moderate given the minimal content and lack of heavy resources. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced SEO metadata. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is straightforward but could be modernized with security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hakeris.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hakeris.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.