Skip to main content

Security report for h2.se

Gibon · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gibon is an established IT company based in Göteborg, Sweden, with a history dating back to 1990. The company specializes in providing tailored IT solutions focusing on security, flexibility, and support for small and medium-sized enterprises. Their service portfolio includes IT support, cloud services, IT security, consulting, and AI-driven analytics and automation. Gibon positions itself as a trusted and experienced IT partner with a strong local presence and loyal customer base. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit published security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website demonstrates a good security posture with room for improvement in transparency and formal security documentation. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, which is justified for this business type, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching h2.se

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention h2.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for h2.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gibon operates in the technology sector, targeting small and medium-sized businesses in Göteborg and surrounding regions. Their business model revolves around providing comprehensive IT services including support, security, cloud infrastructure, and consulting. The company leverages a strong local reputation and long-standing customer relationships as competitive advantages. Their partnership ecosystem includes support platforms and remote assistance tools, enhancing service delivery. The website content and structure indicate a focus on professional service delivery and customer engagement. Growth indicators include diversified IT service offerings and active social media presence. The company also demonstrates corporate social responsibility through sponsorship of local charity Majblomman.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contact information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents compliance and transparency gaps. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy controls. Security culture indicators include proactive cookie management and clear contact channels for support. Enhancing published security documentation and implementing security headers would improve the security posture further.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gibon
Description
IT-företag i Göteborg med fokus på säkerhet och flexibilitet. Vi erbjuder skräddarsydda IT-lösningar för små och medelstora företag i Göteborg.
Key services
IT support, IT security, Cloud services, Flexible workplace solutions, Consulting and advisory, AI, analytics and automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot and is comprehensive.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with emails and phone numbers.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy considerations.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; full content accessible.
  8. WHOIS privacy protection is enabled but justified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using PHP and JavaScript, with jQuery and modern analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Hotjar. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, reflecting good privacy compliance integration. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading for images and deferred script loading. No explicit hosting provider information was found. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with h2.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review h2.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.