Skip to main content

Security report for gyrocom.co.uk

Kerv Group · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in DNS health, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kerv Group is an established UK-based technology and consulting firm specializing in secure, automated network and security solutions for data centres, branch offices, and cloud environments. The company targets enterprise, government, and professional services sectors, offering a range of services focused on digital transformation and security. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business messaging. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern analytics and marketing technologies including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, though there are areas for improvement such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing a security.txt file. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism in place but no visible privacy policy on the analyzed page. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, showing a long-established presence since 1998. The website is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gyrocom.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
73
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kerv Group positions itself as a trusted technology partner for secure digital transformation, focusing on network and security automation. Its business model is B2B, serving sectors like government and professional services. The company benefits from a mature domain age and a consistent brand presence. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies on the site may impact trust for privacy-conscious clients. The firm appears to maintain a moderate to large operational size with a focus on quality service delivery and compliance with industry standards, though explicit certifications were not found on the analyzed page.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS and clientTransferProhibited domain status. The use of reCAPTCHA and cookie consent indicates awareness of security and privacy concerns. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy represent potential vulnerabilities. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information was found, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for enhancements to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy accessible from all pages.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Add Content-Security-Policy and other recommended security headers.
  5. Review and minimize third-party scripts to reduce tracking and potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kerv Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kerv Group
Description
Transform with Kerv Connect: Secure, automated network & security solutions for data centres, branch offices, and cloud.
Key services
Secure network solutions, Automated security solutions, Data centre services, Branch office connectivity, Cloud security
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Omnichannel Live Chat, Borlabs Cookie Consent, Yoast SEO Premium, FontAwesome, Clarity (Microsoft), Google Analytics, Demandbase, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Demandbase
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Demandbase
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. No privacy policy page found on this specific URL or in metadata
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on this page
  5. Multiple third-party tracking and analytics scripts present
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is well-established and not privacy protected
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap
  9. Website content is professional and business-oriented
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and various marketing and analytics tools. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO Premium. Hosting and domain registration are managed by reputable providers. Performance is moderate, likely impacted by multiple external scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. The site would benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security header implementation to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gyrocom.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gyrocom.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.