Skip to main content

Security report for guardtime.com

Guardtime OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Guardtime OÜ is an established technology company founded in 2005, specializing in blockchain-based data integrity and cybersecurity solutions primarily targeting governments and enterprises. Their flagship KSI blockchain platform enables frictionless value exchange in decentralized digital economies. The company maintains a professional and consistent web presence with clear branding and a focus on enterprise clients. Technically, the website is built on the Voog CMS platform, uses modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security or incident response policies. No privacy policy page was found, which is a notable compliance gap. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the company information, indicating high legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching guardtime.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Guardtime holds a strong market position as a provider of blockchain and cybersecurity solutions with deployments since 2008. Their business model focuses on enterprise and government clients requiring data integrity and decentralized digital economy services. The company leverages partnerships and maintains active social media channels to support brand visibility. Revenue streams likely derive from platform licensing, consulting, and cybersecurity services. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with consistent branding and professional communication. No subsidiaries or parent companies were identified. The company targets a niche but critical sector within technology, emphasizing trust and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner for privacy compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and sf14g ad network introduces moderate tracking but no apparent security risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved with enhanced DNS security, published policies, and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Guardtime OÜ
Description
Deployed by governments and enterprise since 2008, Guardtime provides KSI blockchain based solutions enabling frictionless value exchange in a decentralized digital economy.
Key services
KSI blockchain platform, Data integrity solutions, Cybersecurity services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Voog CMS scripts, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
sf14g
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with no visible security warnings
  2. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  3. No privacy policy page found on main site
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, GitHub
  6. Domain DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap
  7. Website content is professional and targeted at enterprise/government clients
  8. No forms detected on homepage or main navigation for direct contact
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Voog CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare DNS services. The HTML and CSS are valid and the site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with video background usage that may impact load times. The site uses asynchronous loading for analytics and tracking scripts, improving perceived performance. Accessibility is basic but functional. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and add security headers to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with guardtime.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review guardtime.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.