Skip to main content

Security report for gtranslate.net

GTranslate Inc · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GTranslate Inc operates a technology-driven SaaS platform specializing in website translation services. Their core offering is a cloud-based Translation Delivery Network that enables websites to be automatically translated into multiple languages, enhancing global reach and international traffic. The company targets website owners and businesses seeking to localize their content efficiently, offering both free and tiered paid subscription plans. The website demonstrates a solid market position with integrations for popular CMS platforms and a focus on neural machine translation technology. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery, and leverages Cloudflare for DNS and domain registration. The presence of Intercom for live chat support indicates a commitment to customer engagement. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices, although some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and security header implementation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reputable hosting and DNS services. However, it lacks several recommended security headers and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a gap for GDPR compliance. Overall, GTranslate presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a mature business model and solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security policies, cookie consent, and enhanced security headers would further strengthen their posture and compliance. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gtranslate.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gtranslate.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GTranslate holds a competitive position in the website translation market by offering a cloud-based proxy translation service that simplifies multilingual website deployment. Their business model is subscription-based with a free tier to attract users and multiple paid plans catering to different business sizes and needs. The company leverages partnerships with major CMS platforms and provides neural machine translation technology, which is a key differentiator. Revenue streams likely include monthly and annual subscriptions. The target customer segments are small to medium businesses and website owners aiming for international expansion. Growth indicators include a 15-day free trial, active user statistics, and a strong FAQ section addressing common concerns. The partnership with TranslateX for API services expands their ecosystem. Operationally, the company emphasizes ease of use, fast deployment, and SEO benefits for multilingual sites.

Security posture

The security maturity of GTranslate's website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. The use of Cloudflare as registrar and DNS provider adds a layer of security and reliability. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. The site lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries in the HTML. Forms appear secure but no advanced anti-CSRF or input validation details are visible. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GTranslate Inc
Description
GTranslate is a website translator which can translate any website to any language automatically and make it available to the world.
Key services
Website translation, Machine translation, Neural translation, Translation editing, Translation Delivery Network, URL translation, Language hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Intercom chat widget, Cloudflare DNS and registrar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare registrar and DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers multilingual website translation services with a cloud-based proxy model.
  2. Clear pricing tiers with free trial and multiple paid plans.
  3. Comprehensive FAQ addressing technical and business questions.
  4. Use of Intercom for live chat and customer support.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR compliance claims.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No phone contact numbers found; contact primarily via email and chat.
  8. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery. It integrates third-party services such as Intercom for live chat and Cloudflare for DNS and domain registration. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and SVG graphics used for visual appeal. The site uses a cloud-based Translation Delivery Network model, avoiding server-side software installation. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. The infrastructure is stable and scalable, leveraging Cloudflare's global network. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but can benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gtranslate.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gtranslate.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.