Skip to main content

Security report for gsmatraining.com

GSMA Training · Education · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GSMA Training is an online educational platform specializing in telecommunications regulatory training, offering accredited courses certified by the United Kingdom Telecoms Academy (UKTA) and recognized for Continuing Professional Development (CPD). The website targets professionals and regulatory authorities in the mobile industry, providing free and paid online courses to address key industry challenges. The platform supports multilingual content, primarily English and French, enhancing accessibility for a broader audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WPML for multilingual support and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a baseline commitment to security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gsmatraining.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education and telecommunications sectors, focusing on professional development through online training courses. Its market positioning is strengthened by recognized certifications (UKTA and CPD), which serve as trust signals to its target audience. The business model revolves around providing accessible, high-quality training content, likely monetized through course registrations and certifications. The presence of multilingual support and a dedicated learning portal indicates a mature digital strategy aimed at expanding reach and engagement. However, the absence of visible contact details and incomplete WHOIS data may limit direct customer engagement and raise questions about transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, along with no visible security policy or incident response contacts, indicates areas for improvement. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations that should be managed carefully to maintain GDPR compliance. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content, but the lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file suggests limited formal security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure consistency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GSMA Training
Description
Just another Agylia Training Sites site
Key services
Online training courses, Certification, Continuing Professional Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress, WPML Multilingual CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional training platform focused on telecommunications regulatory issues.
  2. Content is well structured with multilingual support (English and French).
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or visible content.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is a concern.
  6. Use of multiple tracking and marketing scripts including Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with multilingual capabilities via WPML. It uses modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and CSS, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting appears to be managed by Agylia Network, as indicated by asset URLs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented through Yoast SEO. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The site structure and navigation are clear, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gsmatraining.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gsmatraining.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.