Skip to main content

Security report for grsm.io

PartnerStack · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at grsm.io is registered to PartnerStack, a Canadian technology company founded in 2016. However, the accessible website content is minimal, consisting solely of a single word 'Success.' with no metadata, forms, or visible business information. This suggests the site is either under development or access is restricted by a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security challenge. The domain registration details are consistent and legitimate, indicating a trustworthy ownership. Due to the lack of accessible content, a comprehensive analysis of business operations, services, and compliance cannot be performed. The technical infrastructure appears to be hosted or protected by Cloudflare, but no further technology stack details are available.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grsm.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PartnerStack is positioned as a technology company based in Canada with a domain age consistent with a medium-sized business. The lack of visible content or business descriptions limits insights into their market positioning, business model, or partnerships. No contact information or trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials are present on the accessible site. The domain is registered with Cloudflare, which may indicate a focus on security and performance, but the absence of public-facing content restricts further business intelligence.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the minimal accessible content and probable WAF blocking. WHOIS data shows no privacy protection, which supports transparency. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the content. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. Overall, the security maturity appears low based on accessible data, but the use of Cloudflare suggests some baseline protection.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure the website content is accessible to allow proper analysis and user engagement.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security.
  4. Implement and publish security policies and incident response contacts.
  5. Add visible contact information and business details to enhance trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Minimal HTML content with only 'Success.' text and Cloudflare registrar indicates possible WAF or security challenge blocking full content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
PartnerStack
Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and likely blocked by Cloudflare WAF or security challenge.
  2. No visible metadata, forms, scripts, or external links in the provided HTML content.
  3. WHOIS data is complete and consistent with the business entity PartnerStack in Canada.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the accessible content.
  5. No contact information or security policies are visible.
  6. No analytics or advertising technologies detected due to minimal content.
  7. Content safety is rated safe with no adult or explicit content.
  8. Overall website quality and content are poor due to lack of accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted or protected by Cloudflare, as indicated by the registrar and nameservers. The HTML content is minimal and lacks metadata, scripts, or visible technology indicators. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The domain is active and not expired, but the site appears to be blocked or under restricted access, limiting technical assessment. There is an opportunity to modernize and improve the site by adding structured data, metadata, and user-facing content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grsm.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grsm.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.