Skip to main content

Security report for groupmatics.events

Fevo Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FEVO Enterprise operates as a specialized online group ticket sales platform designed to facilitate organizations in managing group clients and increasing revenue opportunities through targeted marketing and management tools. The platform targets organizations that require group ticketing solutions and provides offer code-based access to tickets, positioning itself as a niche player in the event ticketing technology sector. The website's technical infrastructure leverages modern frontend technologies such as React, integrates multiple payment gateways including Braintree, Shift4, Apple Pay, and Zip Co, and employs analytics and consent management tools to enhance user experience and compliance. Accessibility is addressed through EqualWeb integration, and the site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring performance and security benefits. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and use of recognized payment processors; however, some sensitive keys are exposed in client-side scripts, and no explicit vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Privacy and cookie policies are available and indicate GDPR compliance, though direct contact information and incident response channels are not clearly provided. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and contact availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching groupmatics.events

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FEVO Inc. positions itself as an important technology company within the event ticketing industry, focusing on group sales and marketing management. Its business model is B2B SaaS, targeting organizations that manage group ticket sales. The company leverages partnerships with major payment processors and identity verification services to provide a seamless and secure purchasing experience. The platform's integration with multiple payment and analytics providers indicates a mature digital ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on enterprise clients who likely engage through other channels. The company maintains consistent branding and a professional online presence, supporting its credibility and market position. Growth potential is supported by the use of advanced marketing tools and analytics, though transparency in security and incident response could be enhanced to build further trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of multiple secure payment gateways. Consent management via Didomi and accessibility compliance via EqualWeb reflect attention to regulatory and user needs. However, the exposure of certain API keys and credentials in client-side scripts presents a potential risk that should be mitigated. The lack of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency and may hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. No direct incident response contacts are visible, which could delay response to security events. Security headers are partially implemented or not explicitly visible in the HTML content. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but would benefit from enhanced security hygiene and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Remove or obfuscate any sensitive API keys or credentials from client-side code to prevent misuse.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve security communication and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fevo Inc.
Description
FEVO Enterprise is an online group ticket sales platform that serves as a valuable marketing and management tool for your group clients, while helping your organization better identify those members within the group to increase revenue opportunities.
Key services
Group ticket sales platform, Marketing and management tools for group clients, Offer code based ticket access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Fonts, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Heap Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Braintree Payment Gateway, Shift4 Payment, Apple Pay SDK, Zip Co Payment, LaunchDarkly, Didomi Consent Management, EqualWeb Accessibility
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern payment gateways with public keys
  • Consent management via Didomi
  • Accessibility compliance via EqualWeb

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Heap Analytics
Marketing tools
LaunchDarkly, Heap Analytics, Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern frontend technologies and multiple payment integrations.
  2. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  4. Security best practices are partially implemented but some sensitive keys are exposed in client scripts.
  5. No visible security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy.
  6. Accessibility features implemented via EqualWeb.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with integrations of multiple third-party services including payment gateways (Braintree, Shift4, Apple Pay, Zip Co), analytics (Heap, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel), and consent management (Didomi). Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features implemented through EqualWeb. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Some technical debt is indicated by the presence of exposed keys and lack of certain security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business model effectively, though security hygiene improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with groupmatics.events. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review groupmatics.events.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.