Skip to main content

Security report for grikupamatskola.lv

Griķu pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Griķu pamatskola is a small Latvian primary school under the supervision of the Bauska municipality, providing general and special education programs for children with language and learning difficulties, as well as preschool education. The website reflects a well-established institution with a rich history dating back to 1857. The school targets local students and their families, offering educational and community services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, integrating Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized and includes cookie consent and privacy policies, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting full domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, but could improve security headers and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grikupamatskola.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a public educational institution with oversight from the local municipality, positioning it as a regional educational provider. Its business model is non-commercial, focused on delivering education and support services to children with special needs and the general student population. The website content is consistent and professional, supporting the school's mission and community engagement. The presence of social media links and Google Maps integration enhances community connectivity. The suspicious external links found in hidden elements may indicate a need for website security review to prevent potential SEO or reputational risks. No commercial partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of third-party analytics services involves data transfer outside the EU, which is disclosed in the cookie policy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security management. The website should enhance security headers, regularly audit third-party scripts, and consider publishing security policies and incident contacts to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and remove or replace suspicious external links found in hidden page elements.
  3. Publish a clear incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by maintaining consistent metadata and structured data markup.
  5. Maintain up-to-date WHOIS information and consider domain privacy protection aligned with the institution's transparency requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Griķu pamatskola
Description
Griķu pamatskola is a general education institution under the supervision of Bauska municipality offering basic education and special education programs for children with language and learning difficulties, as well as preschool education, providing a friendly and supportive environment for student growth.
Key services
basic education, special education for language and learning difficulties, preschool education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational site for a Latvian primary school.
  2. Content is rich with historical and educational information.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  4. No contact phone numbers explicitly found; only email and physical addresses.
  5. Some suspicious external links appear in hidden divs, possibly injected or spam-related.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. No data protection officer contact information found.
  9. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
  10. Security headers are not explicitly visible in HTML; HTTPS is used.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from trusted CDNs such as cdnjs.cloudflare.com. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, contributing to good usability. The site lacks explicit structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO. Some hidden links to suspicious domains suggest possible security or SEO issues that should be investigated. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and content hygiene.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grikupamatskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grikupamatskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.