Skip to main content

Security report for grafana.net

Grafana Labs · Technology · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grafana Labs is a leading technology company specializing in open source analytics and monitoring solutions, primarily targeting developers, IT professionals, and enterprises seeking comprehensive observability platforms. The company offers a robust suite of products including Grafana Cloud, Loki for logs, Tempo for tracing, and Mimir for metrics, complemented by AI/ML insights and alerting capabilities. Recognized as a leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Observability Platforms, Grafana Labs maintains a strong market position with a focus on innovation and customer-centric solutions. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies such as the Hugo static site generator, Alpine.js for interactivity, and Tailwind CSS for styling, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, supported by comprehensive SEO and metadata implementations. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring detailed privacy and cookie policies with active consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configurations and includes essential security headers. While no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, the domain registration data is transparent and consistent with the company's history, enhancing trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, Grafana Labs presents a professional, secure, and compliant digital presence aligned with its enterprise stature. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing formal security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to further enhance security posture and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching grafana.net

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grafana Labs operates in the technology sector with a focus on observability and monitoring solutions. Its business model combines open source software with cloud-based and enterprise offerings, targeting a broad audience from individual developers to large enterprises. The company benefits from strong market recognition, including Gartner leadership, and maintains a diverse product ecosystem addressing logs, metrics, tracing, and incident response. Partnerships and integrations with cloud providers and open source communities strengthen its competitive advantage. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with clear messaging, comprehensive product information, and active engagement channels, supporting growth and customer acquisition strategies.

Security posture

The security posture of Grafana Labs' website is solid, with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap in DNS security. The site uses reputable third-party services for cookie consent and analytics, with user tracking moderated by consent mechanisms. No direct contact information for security incidents or a published security policy was found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and incident response readiness. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalizing security communications and expanding DNS protections.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grafana Labs
Description
Grafana is the open source analytics and monitoring solution for every database.
Key services
Grafana Cloud, Open source Grafana visualization, Logs aggregation (Loki), Tracing (Tempo), Metrics (Mimir, Prometheus), AI/ML insights, Alerting, SLO management, Incident response, Performance testing (k6)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, Alpine.js, Tailwind CSS, Font Awesome, OneTrust cookie consent, Hotjar (conditional), AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Platforms
AWS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, Adobe Experience Platform
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Adobe Experience Platform (tt.omtrdc.net)
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong compliance with privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms.
  3. Comprehensive business and product information with clear navigation.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and good performance optimizations.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency of the domain ownership.
  7. Social media presence is well integrated with official company accounts.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern and efficient technical stack including Hugo for static site generation, Alpine.js for lightweight interactivity, and Tailwind CSS for responsive design. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure ensures reliability and scalability. Performance is optimized with preloading of critical CSS and fonts, lazy loading of images, and minimal blocking scripts. Accessibility considerations are evident through semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. The site integrates third-party tools for analytics and consent management, balancing functionality with privacy. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to enhance DNS security and formalize security-related disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grafana.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grafana.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.