Skip to main content

Security report for gptom.com

Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gptom.com presents itself as a provider of a mobile terminal solution, likely targeting Czech-speaking users interested in mobile payment or commerce terminals. The site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It employs several plugins including User Registration Pro and Weglot for multilingual support, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. The technical infrastructure is moderately modern and the site appears mobile-optimized with a good user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No privacy policy or terms of service were found, though a cookie consent mechanism is active. Security headers are not detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are visible, indicating a basic security posture. Overall, the site functions but lacks critical trust and compliance elements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gptom.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate in the technology sector, specifically offering mobile terminal services likely related to payments or commerce. The target audience is Czech-speaking mobile users. The business model seems to be e-commerce or SaaS-based, leveraging WooCommerce for transactions. There is no clear information on company size, founding year, or parent/subsidiary relationships. The site lacks visible trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials. The use of Weglot suggests an intent to reach multilingual markets. The absence of contact details and business registration information limits confidence in business credibility.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with no detected security headers and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details. The site uses HTTPS as inferred from external resource URLs but this is not explicitly confirmed. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The presence of cookie consent indicates some privacy awareness but GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration transparency is a significant risk factor. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and disclose domain registration information to enhance legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to promote a mobile terminal solution, likely a payment or commerce terminal app, targeting Czech-speaking users.
Key services
mobile terminal application
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, WooCommerce, User Registration Pro Plugin, Download Manager Plugin, Weglot (translation), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Weglot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  5. No clear contact information or business registration details visible.
  6. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and WooCommerce plugin.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. Site content is primarily in Czech language.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No visible security or incident response contact information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which is a modern and flexible framework. WooCommerce integration indicates e-commerce functionality. The site uses several plugins for user registration, downloads, and multilingual support (Weglot). Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site appears to be mobile-optimized and has a moderate performance profile. However, no advanced security configurations or performance optimizations are evident. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small to medium business but requires improvements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gptom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gptom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.