Skip to main content

Security report for google.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

This website is the official Google Accounts sign-in portal, operated by Google LLC, a global leader in internet services and technology. It serves as a secure gateway for users to access various Google services including email, cloud storage, and productivity tools. The site is highly optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting Google's commitment to user experience and security. The technical infrastructure leverages Google's own cloud platform and APIs, ensuring scalability and reliability. Security measures are robust, including HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and secure form handling, minimizing risks of data breaches or unauthorized access. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of google.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching google.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention google.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
163,268,003
Employees
2,598
Customers
163,232,052
Third parties
33,353
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-10-26 · 174,376 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for google.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –accounts.google.com2026-10-26
  • –accounts.google.com2026-10-26
  • –accounts.google.com2026-10-26
  • –accounts.google.com2026-10-26
  • –accounts.google.com2026-10-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC holds a dominant market position in the technology sector, particularly in online advertising, cloud computing, and consumer internet services. The business model is primarily advertising-driven, supplemented by cloud services and hardware sales. The target audience is broad, encompassing general consumers, enterprises, and developers worldwide. Google's extensive ecosystem includes subsidiaries like YouTube and Android, enhancing its market reach and service integration. The company's strategic partnerships and continuous innovation maintain its competitive advantage and growth trajectory.

Security posture

The security posture of the Google Accounts sign-in page is exemplary, with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure authentication flows. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. While WHOIS data is privacy protected, this is consistent with large enterprises and does not indicate risk. Compliance with privacy regulations is implied but not explicitly detailed on this page. Incident response and security policies are managed at the corporate level, ensuring rapid mitigation of threats. The site is well-prepared against common web threats and maintains a strong security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain continuous monitoring and patching of all web components to prevent emerging vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance explicit privacy and cookie policy disclosures on all user-facing pages to improve transparency.
  3. Implement visible security indicators or trust seals to reassure users during login.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and APIs for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Expand user education on secure account practices and phishing awareness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google LLC provides internet-related services and products including online advertising technologies, search engine, cloud computing, software, and hardware.
Key services
user authentication, account management, cloud services, advertising
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google APIs, Material Design Components, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
GlifWebSignIn UI framework (Google internal)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • secure cookies
  • CSRF protection
  • input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google APIs, and Material Design components, ensuring a responsive and accessible user interface. Hosting on Google Cloud Platform provides high availability and performance. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile devices, with proper meta tags and SEO practices. No CMS is detected as the site is custom-built. Technical debt appears minimal, with ongoing updates and improvements evident. Opportunities exist to further enhance accessibility features and privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 92/100Low9 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low25 findingsView report
  3. 76/100 +4Low25 findingsView report
  4. 72/100 −2Medium26 findingsView report
  5. 74/100 +2Medium25 findingsView report
  6. 72/100 −2Medium26 findingsView report
  7. 74/100 −1Medium25 findingsView report
  8. 75/100 −3Medium26 findingsView report
  9. 78/100Low24 findingsView report
  10. 78/100Low24 findingsView report
  11. 78/100 −1Low23 findingsView report
  12. 79/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with google.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review google.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.