Skip to main content

Security report for goodplanet.be

GoodPlanet Belgium · Education · Belgium

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GoodPlanet Belgium is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to promoting sustainability and environmental education primarily in Belgium. The organization targets schools, businesses, and the general public with educational projects, training, and awareness campaigns. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with active social media engagement and multimedia content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CAPTCHA protections, though some improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. Overall, the domain appears legitimate despite WHOIS privacy restrictions, and the website provides a trustworthy and informative platform for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goodplanet.be

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention goodplanet.be, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
30%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for goodplanet.be.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GoodPlanet Belgium occupies a niche in the environmental education and non-profit sector with a focus on sustainability challenges and projects. Its business model revolves around educational services and public engagement rather than commercial sales. The organization leverages partnerships, such as with Deloitte, and maintains a multi-channel presence including social media and newsletters. The website supports growth through open registrations for projects and corporate training. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication approach, likely centralized through forms and dedicated pages. The presence of donation and job application platforms indicates a mature operational structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and integration of tracking pixels for analytics. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified for a non-profit but restricts domain ownership visibility. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use and maintain updated software versions.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoodPlanet Belgium
Description
GoodPlanet Belgium is a non-profit organization focused on promoting sustainability and environmental education. They offer projects and training for schools, businesses, and the general public to encourage sustainable practices and awareness.
Key services
Educational projects for schools, Corporate training and workshops, Public awareness campaigns, Sustainability challenges and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.7.1, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook SDK, Yoast SEO plugin, Smart Logo Showcase Lite plugin, Metaslider plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Facebook Pixel and LinkedIn Insight for tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Facebook SDK, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available due to privacy restrictions
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on homepage
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active
  5. Use of modern web technologies and plugins
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers visible
  8. Contact form present via Contact page link
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using Bootstrap 3.3.7 for responsive design and jQuery 3.7.1 for scripting. It employs several plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Contact Form 7 for forms, Metaslider for image sliders, and Smart Logo Showcase Lite for logos. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for bot protection. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as Google Fonts and FontAwesome. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses Facebook SDK and LinkedIn Insight for marketing and analytics. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goodplanet.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goodplanet.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.