Skip to main content

Security report for gogowego.com

Prisme.ai · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prisme.ai is a technology platform offering scalable AI and automation solutions primarily targeting developers and enterprises. The platform provides tools for workspace creation, app development, and API integrations, positioning itself as an innovative player in the AI platform market. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, some technical aspects such as security headers and explicit HTTPS enforcement are not clearly visible in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence, though cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image but would benefit from enhanced security and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gogowego.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
78
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gogowego.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
40
Employees
0
Customers
40
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gogowego.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prisme.ai operates in the technology sector with a focus on AI platform services and automation tools. Its business model revolves around providing a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) for AI-driven solutions. The target audience includes developers and organizations seeking customizable AI capabilities. The company demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, though lacks explicit contact details and certifications that could further enhance credibility. The presence of multiple subdomains related to API and studio services suggests an ecosystem approach. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its scalable and rule-based AI platform offering.

Security posture

The security posture of Prisme.ai is moderate. While the site is accessible over HTTPS (implied by URLs), no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no incident response or security policy pages are publicly visible. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The WHOIS data is privacy protected and malformed, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the platform should enhance its security headers, publish incident response and security policies, and implement cookie consent to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Ensure HTTPS is strictly enforced and SSL/TLS configuration is strong and up to date.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Provide visible and verified contact information including support emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prisme.ai
Description
Your Gen.AI Platform at scale, Your rules.
Key services
AI platform services, Automation tools, Workspace and app creation, API integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, WebSockets
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response and privacy protections.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the public site.
  5. Privacy policy is present and comprehensive, indicating GDPR compliance.
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. Content is technology-focused, targeting developers and enterprises.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and efficient client-side interactivity. The use of WebSockets and API endpoints indicates a dynamic and interactive platform. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preloading of fonts. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features appear basic. SEO optimization is present but could be improved with more comprehensive meta tags and structured data. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The technical infrastructure supports scalability but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gogowego.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gogowego.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.