Skip to main content

Security report for gog.community

Guardians Guild Limited · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gog.community represents Guardians Guild Limited, a blockchain gaming ecosystem centered around the $GOG token and the Guild of Guardians universe. It offers token staking rewards, NFT marketplaces, and in-game utilities, targeting gamers and blockchain enthusiasts. The site is professionally designed using Webflow with modern technologies such as Swiper.js, D3.js, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Mobile optimization and user experience are strong, with clear navigation and consistent branding. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide direct contact information, which impacts privacy compliance and business credibility scores. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but no security headers were detected in the provided data. WHOIS data is privacy protected, common in crypto domains, but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy within its niche but would benefit from improved compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gog.community

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Guardians Guild Limited operates in the blockchain gaming sector, leveraging token economics and NFT marketplaces to engage its community. The business model includes revenue streams from token sales, staking rewards funded by primary sales, in-app purchases, and secondary market royalties. The ecosystem is supported by partnerships with exchanges like OKX, Quickswap, Gate.io, and Sushiswap, and official portals for governance and altar utilities. The company is a subsidiary of the IMX Ecosystem Foundation, indicating strategic backing. Growth indicators include a large user base (1,000,000 Guardians) and app store presence with a 4.8 rating. The company targets gamers interested in blockchain and NFT gaming, positioning itself as a niche player with a focused community. The lack of public WHOIS data is typical in this industry but should be balanced with transparent policies to enhance trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the scripts used. The site does not provide explicit security policies or incident response contacts, which limits its readiness for handling security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant compliance gap especially for users in GDPR jurisdictions. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and publishing clear data protection and incident response information to improve its security culture and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels and a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance transparency by publishing business registration details and data protection officer contact if applicable.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or excessive user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Guardians Guild Limited
Description
Enjoy unmatched in-game perks, exclusive rewards, and top-tier community benefits. Buy $GOG now, elevate your game, and dominate the Guild of Guardians universe!
Key services
Token staking and rewards, NFT marketplace, In-game purchases and utilities, Governance and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Swiper.js v11, D3.js v3.5.17, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Strong focus on blockchain gaming token $GOG and ecosystem
  5. Use of modern web technologies and good mobile optimization
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected and incomplete
  8. External links mostly to trusted crypto exchanges and official portals
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.5.1, Swiper.js for carousels, and D3.js for data visualization. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and loads quickly, indicating good performance. The HTML and CSS are valid and structured for SEO with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features beyond basic compliance. Hosting is provided by Webflow, a reputable provider. There is no evidence of server-side technologies or CMS beyond Webflow. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business model but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gog.community. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gog.community.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.