Skip to main content

Security report for goacoustic.com

Acoustic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at login.goacoustic.com serves as a secure login portal for Acoustic, a company specializing in marketing technology solutions. The site is designed primarily for business users and customers to access Acoustic's services, leveraging Okta for authentication and TrustArc for cookie consent management. The portal reflects a professional and consistent brand image aligned with enterprise-level marketing technology providers. However, the login page itself contains minimal public-facing content, lacking privacy policies, terms of service, or contact information, which limits transparency for external visitors. From a technical perspective, the site employs modern web technologies including React components and secure HTTPS connections. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates some attention to privacy compliance, though explicit privacy and security policies are not directly accessible from the login page. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but no visible advanced security headers detected in the provided data. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain is typical for subdomains and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a login portal, but improvements could be made by adding explicit security headers and publicly accessible privacy and terms documents. The business credibility is supported by the association with Acoustic, a recognized enterprise in marketing technology. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy transparency, improving accessibility, and strengthening security headers to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goacoustic.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Acoustic operates in the marketing technology sector, providing customer engagement platforms and data-driven marketing services primarily to business clients. The login portal indicates a SaaS business model focused on secure access to proprietary marketing tools. Acoustic positions itself as an enterprise-level provider with a consistent brand and professional digital presence. The lack of public business contact details on the login page suggests a focus on authenticated users rather than public marketing. The company likely generates revenue through subscriptions or licensing of its marketing platform. The technology stack and partner integrations (Okta, TrustArc) reflect a mature digital infrastructure supporting secure and compliant operations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications for user login. Use of Okta indicates reliance on a robust third-party identity provider for authentication security. Cookie consent is managed via TrustArc, supporting privacy compliance efforts. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. The absence of visible privacy and security policies on the login page reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. Incident response contacts and security certifications are not publicly visible. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security and privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from the login page to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to support users with disabilities and improve overall user experience.
  4. Provide clear contact information or support channels on the login portal for user assistance and incident reporting.
  5. Develop and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Acoustic
Description
Acoustic provides marketing technology solutions, focusing on customer engagement and data-driven marketing services.
Key services
customer engagement platform, marketing automation, data analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Okta (authentication), IBM Plex Sans font, TrustArc (cookie consent), React Grid Layout
Frameworks
React (implied by react-grid-layout)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal likely for Acoustic's customers or employees
  2. No public WHOIS data for subdomain login.goacoustic.com
  3. No contact or business info on the login page
  4. Cookie consent implemented via TrustArc
  5. Uses Okta for authentication
  6. No privacy or terms of service links visible on login page
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern front-end stack with React components and IBM Plex Sans fonts, indicating a contemporary UI design approach. Okta integration provides secure authentication services. TrustArc is used for cookie consent management, reflecting GDPR and privacy compliance awareness. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate based on the complexity of scripts and stylesheets loaded. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the data. The absence of SEO meta tags and structured data limits search engine visibility. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and security headers would enhance the technical maturity and resilience of the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goacoustic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goacoustic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.