Skip to main content

Security report for gnoss.com

RIAM INTELEARNING LAB S.L. · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GNOSS is a technology company specializing in semantic artificial intelligence platforms and knowledge graph solutions. Their platform offers both open source and enterprise options, targeting organizations across sectors such as banking, education, culture, healthcare, and government. The company provides a range of services including business consulting, ontology engineering, AI and NLP services, and cloud platform deployment. Their market position is that of a specialized provider of semantic AI technology with a partner ecosystem and multiple customer references. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and data visualization. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and has good SEO and content quality. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, and Google Analytics is used for tracking with user consent. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enforced and a security policy document is publicly available. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or not found, which is unusual and reduces trustworthiness somewhat. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are listed, only a contact form. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business presence with good content and technical implementation. The main risk is the lack of WHOIS transparency and some missing security best practices. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving direct contact information availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gnoss.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GNOSS operates in the semantic AI technology sector, providing a platform and consulting services to a diverse set of industries including banking, education, culture, healthcare, and government. Their business model combines software licensing (open source and enterprise) with professional services and cloud hosting. The company maintains a partner ecosystem and showcases multiple customer case studies, indicating a mature market presence. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, consulting fees, and cloud services. The company targets organizations seeking advanced knowledge management and AI solutions. Growth indicators include recent platform version launches and active partner collaboration. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract from the visible business operations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security requirements. A security policy document is publicly accessible, suggesting formal security governance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of incident response contact information are gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response readiness. The missing WHOIS data reduces trust but does not indicate direct compromise.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security collaboration.
  3. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party libraries and scripts to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RIAM INTELEARNING LAB S.L.
Description
GNOSS Semantic Artificial Intelligence Platform enables organizations to incorporate intelligence into their business and build a new world of inventiveness.
Key services
Semantic AI Platform, Knowledge Graph Management, Business Consulting, Ontology Engineering, Cloud Platform Services, AI and NLP Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, Google Material Icons, DataTables, Owl Carousel, Isotope, ScrollMagic, Particles.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Security policy publicly available

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on semantic AI and knowledge graph technology
  3. Multiple customer case studies and partner ecosystem presented
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and visible
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only
  6. WHOIS data missing or not found, which is unusual for .com domain
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  8. Use of multiple modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks
  9. Google Analytics used for tracking with consent banner
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse set of JavaScript libraries and frameworks including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, DataTables, Owl Carousel, Isotope, ScrollMagic, and Particles.js. These provide rich UI components, responsive design, and interactive features. The site loads resources from multiple subdomains under gnoss.ws and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with some heavy visual elements like particle animations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gnoss.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gnoss.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.