Skip to main content

Security report for gnosis.io

Gnosis · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gnosis is a technology company focused on providing full stack decentralization solutions, including infrastructure and applications for an open internet. The company targets developers and blockchain enthusiasts, positioning itself as an established player in the blockchain infrastructure space. The website is built using Framer, indicating a modern and visually appealing design approach. Technical infrastructure includes standard web technologies and Google Analytics for user tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers, though additional security headers and privacy policies are recommended. The absence of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in compliance and user trust. Overall, the website presents a professional image but would benefit from enhanced privacy and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gnosis.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gnosis operates in the blockchain technology sector, offering decentralized infrastructure and applications. Its business model likely revolves around providing tools and platforms for decentralized applications, targeting a niche but growing market segment. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and good content quality. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The use of Google Analytics indicates a moderate level of user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy considerations. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes a Content-Security-Policy header restricting frame ancestors, which helps prevent clickjacking. However, other common security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS are missing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially relevant under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could hinder transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  4. Review and optimize accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gnosis
Description
Full stack decentralization—infrastructure and applications for an open internet
Key services
Decentralized infrastructure, Decentralized applications, Blockchain tools and services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), Google Analytics, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Framer for design and hosting
  2. No visible contact information or policies found on the main page
  3. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable
  4. Security headers are minimal but include CSP
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content
  8. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by external resources and design complexity. No CMS other than Framer was detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and some security headers, representing opportunities for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gnosis.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gnosis.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.