Skip to main content

Security report for gmnetwork.ai

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GM Agents is a technology startup offering an app platform that aggregates multiple AI agents, enabling users to engage with various AI tools in one place and earn rewards based on usage. The website presents a modern, well-designed interface built with Next.js and React, optimized for mobile devices and featuring clear navigation and branding consistency. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare DNS and modern web technologies, although no CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place, but lacking DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism or detailed GDPR compliance indicators. Business credibility is supported by professional content and domain registration through a reputable registrar with privacy protection, appropriate for a new tech venture. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmnetwork.ai

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GM Agents targets the AI technology market, positioning itself as an aggregator platform for AI agents with an incentive-based user engagement model. The business model likely revolves around app usage and possibly monetization through partnerships or premium features. The company is small and newly founded, with no public parent or subsidiary companies. The website links to documentation, a Linktree, and a Discord community, indicating an ecosystem approach and community engagement. The lack of direct contact information and limited marketing tools suggests an early-stage startup focusing on product development and user acquisition. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for tech startups to safeguard registrant privacy. The company operates primarily in the US market, consistent with the registrant country.

Security posture

The security maturity of GM Agents is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized domain changes, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers (such as Content Security Policy or HSTS) were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and tracking disclosures indicates incomplete privacy compliance. Overall, the site is secure enough for general use but should enhance security controls and transparency to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Include clear contact information such as support email or phone to enhance business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
All your AI agents in one app - use more, earn more.
Key services
AI agents aggregation, User engagement with AI tools, Incentive/earning system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS servers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern Next.js app with good design and mobile optimization.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Privacy and terms pages exist but cookie policy and consent are missing.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Domain is very new (future date 2025-06-09 likely a data error or placeholder).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. The use of Cloudflare DNS suggests a reliable DNS infrastructure, though no explicit hosting provider is identified. The site preloads custom fonts and images for performance optimization and uses SVGs for logos and icons, contributing to fast rendering and good mobile experience. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy concerns but may limit marketing insights. The site is moderately fast and mobile-optimized but could improve accessibility features and SEO metadata completeness. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a startup but has room for enhancements in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmnetwork.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmnetwork.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.