Skip to main content

Security report for gmg.biz

GMG GmbH · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GMG GmbH is a well-established IT and media service provider operating primarily in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Founded in 1991, the company offers a broad range of services including IT systems engineering, web development, media project management, and hardware sales. They maintain data centers in Balzers and Zurich, supporting a regional clientele with SaaS contracts and long-term IT support. The website reflects a professional business with clear service offerings and a strong team presence. Technically, the website is built on a proprietary CMS using ASP.NET and IIS servers, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and fullPage.js. The site uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. While the site is mobile responsive to a basic degree and performs moderately well, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or security policies. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor compliance gap. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and contact transparency. Overall, GMG GmbH presents a credible and professional digital presence with moderate technical maturity and a solid security baseline. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance their posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gmg.biz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmg.biz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GMG GmbH occupies a niche regional market in IT and media services with a diversified portfolio including consulting, software development, and hardware sales. Their long-standing presence since 1991 and multiple physical locations indicate stability and local market penetration. The business model focuses on service contracts and SaaS offerings, targeting SMEs and enterprises in Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The company leverages proprietary technology and maintains direct customer support channels, which are competitive advantages. The absence of social media presence suggests a traditional marketing approach. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded compliance certifications.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a foundational security posture with HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling via ASP.NET. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance. The use of Matomo analytics is positive for privacy but should be complemented with cookie consent mechanisms. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain transparency but does not indicate malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for improvement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications to boost trust and compliance posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GMG GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GMG GmbH
Description
GMG GmbH offers customer-oriented, individual services in IT, web, and media sectors. They provide web design, software development, IT solutions, and operate data centers in Liechtenstein and Switzerland. They also run an IT shop and a bookstore.
Key services
IT Systems Engineering, Web development, Media project management, IT shop and hardware sales, Software development, Long-term IT support and SaaS contracts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
.NET, IIS Server, jQuery, fullPage.js, Matomo Analytics, Google Fonts
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Platforms
Windows Server (IIS)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with ASP.NET validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in German targeting Swiss and Liechtenstein markets
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners visible on main page
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual but not necessarily malicious
  5. Use of Matomo analytics indicates some privacy awareness
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain emails and phone numbers
  7. Website uses proprietary CMS and ASP.NET technology stack
  8. No social media links detected
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET framework running on IIS servers, using a proprietary CMS tailored for client management. The front-end uses jQuery and fullPage.js for UI effects and navigation. Google Fonts are loaded externally, and Matomo is used for analytics, indicating a preference for open-source tracking solutions. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO is basic with meta descriptions and keywords but could be enhanced with structured data and improved semantic markup. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmg.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmg.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.