Skip to main content

Security report for gljianyou.com

Education · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website '青少年学网' is an educational content platform focused on providing encyclopedic knowledge across various domains such as daily life tips, science, health, parenting, and youth education. It targets a general audience including children, teenagers, and adults seeking knowledge enrichment. The business model appears to be content publishing with no direct e-commerce or transactional services evident. The site maintains a moderate content quality with a basic but functional design and navigation structure. Technically, the site uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.3.1 and Baidu Analytics for user tracking. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal. The site lacks HTTPS information in the provided data, and no security headers or advanced security measures are detected, indicating a weak security posture. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS, outdated JavaScript libraries, and lack of privacy or cookie policies present significant risks. No contact or incident response information is available, limiting the ability to address security or privacy concerns effectively. The WHOIS data is unavailable or missing, which raises questions about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional for educational content delivery but requires urgent improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and protect users. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, updating technology stack, adding privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and publishing clear contact and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gljianyou.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the education sector, focusing on knowledge dissemination for youth and general audiences. It leverages content publishing as its primary business model, likely monetized through advertising or partnerships. The presence of multiple related domains suggests a networked ecosystem possibly offering complementary services or content. However, the lack of transparent business information, contact details, and WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess market positioning or revenue streams. The site targets a broad demographic interested in practical knowledge and science, positioning itself as a general knowledge resource rather than a niche specialist. Growth indicators are not evident from the data, and partnerships appear limited to content or service-related domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low security maturity level. Critical issues include the absence of HTTPS, no security headers, use of outdated JavaScript libraries, and lack of privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which hinders vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The site does not show evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The use of Baidu Analytics without consent mechanisms further exposes privacy compliance gaps. These factors collectively increase the risk of data interception, user tracking without consent, and potential exploitation of outdated components. Immediate remediation is necessary to improve security posture and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
青少年学网是一个内容丰富、更新及时的百科全书式知识网站，涵盖生活常识、趣味科普、实用问答、健康知识、科学探索、育儿教育等多个领域。无论是儿童启蒙、青少年学习，还是成年人拓展知识储备，这里都是您理想的知识宝库。每天一点新知识，打开智慧新世界。
Key services
百科内容, 生活常识, 趣味科普, 实用问答, 健康知识, 科学探索, 育儿教育
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.3.1, Baidu Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is content-rich with a focus on educational and general knowledge topics.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Website uses outdated jQuery version (1.3.1) which may pose security risks.
  5. Baidu Analytics tracking is implemented, but no cookie consent mechanism is present.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No HTTPS information available from provided data; security posture likely weak.
  8. Multiple subdomains and external domains linked, some appear to be related content or services.
  9. No social media links or official company contact information found.
  10. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses an outdated jQuery version (1.3.1) and Baidu Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is basic with minimal modern web technologies or frameworks detected. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced platform usage. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, indicating potential usability issues on diverse devices. SEO is minimally addressed through meta tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical stack is dated and requires modernization to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gljianyou.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gljianyou.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.