Skip to main content

Security report for glitnor.com

Glitnor Group · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glitnor Group is a medium-sized technology company specializing in the iGaming sector, operating multiple B2C online casino brands and a B2B game studio. The company has a strong presence in Sweden and offices in Malta, Bulgaria, Spain, and Gibraltar. Their business model combines direct consumer-facing casino operations with game content development and affiliate marketing. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear information about their brands and services, targeting adult online gamblers and industry partners. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery, and Google Maps API. The site performs moderately well with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO optimizations. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. This inconsistency affects the overall trust score despite the professional appearance and business presence. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, Glitnor Group's website reflects a credible and professional business in the iGaming industry but would benefit from enhanced security practices, transparent privacy policies, and WHOIS data clarity to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glitnor.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glitnor Group holds a competitive position in the Swedish iGaming market with rapid growth since its founding in 2018. Their portfolio includes four major casino brands and a B2B game studio, enabling diversified revenue streams from both direct player engagement and business partnerships. The company emphasizes innovation, agility, and entrepreneurial spirit, supported by over 200 team members across multiple European locations. Their affiliate program and venture investments indicate a strategic approach to market expansion and ecosystem development. The absence of detailed financial or regulatory disclosures on the website suggests a focus on brand and product promotion rather than investor relations at this stage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet industry best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels to improve transparency and security culture.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to strengthen legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glitnor Group
Description
Glitnor Group is an innovative, entrepreneurial and agile operator with offices in Sweden, Malta, Bulgaria and Spain/Gibraltar. Founded by industry veterans and home to over two hundred team members, the Group operates four leading B2C brands: Happy, Lucky, Flax and Vera&John Casinos, in addition to its own in-house B2B Game Studio, Swintt. The Group has established a leading presence in its core market of Sweden and aims for global leadership in the iGaming sector.
Key services
Online casino brands (HappyCasino, LuckyCasino, FlaxCasino, Vera&John), B2B game studio (Swintt), Affiliate marketing (Glitnor Affiliates), Venture investments (Glitnor Ventures)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://)
  • Use of secure forms with input validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an established business.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main site.
  4. Contact form and physical addresses present but no direct emails or phone numbers.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected beyond jQuery and Google Fonts.
  7. Content is focused on iGaming and gambling brands targeting adult users.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery. It integrates Google Maps API for location display and Vimeo for video content. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML or scripts. However, the absence of advanced SEO tags and accessibility features suggests room for technical improvement. The hosting appears to be via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable uptime and delivery. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glitnor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glitnor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.