Skip to main content

Security report for glassdoor.co.in

Glassdoor · Technology · India

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glassdoor is a leading global job search and career community platform that provides millions of job listings, company reviews, salary comparisons, and anonymous workplace discussions. The platform targets job seekers, professionals, and employers, offering a comprehensive ecosystem for career development and employer branding. The website demonstrates a strong market position with consistent branding and a professional digital presence. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React, RudderStack for data collection, Google Tag Manager, and Amplitude for analytics. The site is well optimized for mobile and accessibility, with good SEO practices and performance. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced and several security headers present, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The security posture is solid, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is moderate; while a cookie consent mechanism is implemented, explicit privacy and terms of service documents were not found in the provided content. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain registration, consistent with the business claims. Overall, Glassdoor's website is professional, secure, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glassdoor.co.in

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glassdoor operates in the technology sector as an essential entity providing online job search and employer review services. Its business model revolves around connecting job seekers with employers through a platform offering job listings, company reviews, and salary data. The company benefits from a strong brand and extensive user base, leveraging partnerships with analytics and marketing service providers. Growth indicators include extensive global reach and a comprehensive service offering. The platform's ecosystem supports both individual users and employers, with dedicated employer services such as enhanced profiles and sales contacts. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining privacy compliance and enhancing security transparency to sustain user trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers configured to protect user data and prevent common web vulnerabilities. The use of asynchronous and deferred script loading improves performance without compromising security. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive information were detected. The platform employs modern analytics and tracking tools, which necessitates robust privacy controls. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive security and privacy documentation and implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security policy and incident response information including dedicated contact channels.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to further mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  5. Review and document data retention policies and ensure GDPR compliance transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glassdoor
Description
Find your work people at the new home for workplace conversation. Search millions of jobs, salaries and company reviews and chat anonymously about worklife.
Key services
Job search, Company reviews, Salary comparisons, Employer branding services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React 18.3.1, RudderStack (rudderlabs.com), Google Tag Manager, ScorecardResearch, Cookielaw.org Consent SDK, Amplitude Engagement SDK
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async and defer for scripts
  • Content Security Policy not explicitly detected in provided data

Analytics and tracking

Services
ScorecardResearch, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ScorecardResearch
Tracking pixels
Amplitude
Marketing tools
RudderStack, Amplitude
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional job search and career community platform
  2. Content is rich and well structured with modern web technologies
  3. Strong brand presence with consistent branding and social media links
  4. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  5. Privacy and terms policies not explicitly linked or found in provided content
  6. Extensive use of analytics and tracking scripts
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools such as RudderStack, Google Tag Manager, and Amplitude. The infrastructure supports asynchronous script loading and font preloading for performance optimization. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data markup (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details were not available in the provided data. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to improve load times by optimizing third-party scripts. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple external domains for analytics and marketing, which should be monitored for privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glassdoor.co.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glassdoor.co.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.