Skip to main content

Security report for gisecurity.lv

Global Intellectual Security · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Global Intellectual Security operates as a Latvian-based provider specializing in autonomous online video surveillance services. The company positions itself as an innovator in the remote video monitoring sector within Latvia, offering professional video operators and technical support around the clock. The website content is primarily in Latvian and targets local customers seeking advanced security monitoring solutions. The business model focuses on service provision rather than product sales, emphasizing technology-enabled surveillance. Technically, the website is built on the Creatium platform and integrates modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookie Script for cookie management and consent. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and a professional design, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with proper meta tags supporting SEO. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. No privacy policy or terms of service are found, which impacts compliance and trust. The absence of contact information and WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify legitimacy and security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which is a gap in security readiness. Overall, the website presents a moderately trustworthy and professional front for a small Latvian security service provider but would benefit from enhanced transparency, security best practices, and compliance documentation to improve trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gisecurity.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gisecurity.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
1
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gisecurity.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.gisecurity.lv2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the Latvian security market with a focus on remote video surveillance services. Its competitive advantage lies in offering autonomous, technologically advanced monitoring with professional operators and technical support. The business model is service-oriented, likely generating revenue through subscriptions or contracts for surveillance services. The website branding is consistent and professional, supporting a small-sized enterprise profile. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information online suggests a need for improved transparency to support growth and partnership opportunities. The integration of analytics and cookie management tools indicates an awareness of digital marketing and compliance requirements, albeit incomplete.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers are detected. The absence of privacy and security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and best security practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks visible certifications or trust seals. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive indicator but insufficient alone. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and establish incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS registration details and ensure domain registration information is publicly accessible and consistent with business identity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Global Intellectual Security
Description
«Global Intellectual Security» ir novators attālinātās videonovērošanas jomā Latvijā. Mūsu birojs ir aprīkots ar jaunākajām tehnoloģijām, kur visu diennakti strādā profesionāli video operatori un tehniskā atbalsta inženieri.
Key services
Remote video surveillance, Professional video operators, Technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, Creatium International platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content
  6. Website uses Google Tag Manager and Cookie Script for analytics and cookie management
  7. Website built on Creatium platform
  8. Content is in Latvian language targeting Latvian market
  9. No visible security certifications or incident response contacts
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Creatium platform, utilizing JavaScript and Google Tag Manager for analytics and cookie management. The site loads asynchronously with deferred scripts, indicating a modern approach to performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility compliance. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gisecurity.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gisecurity.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.