Skip to main content

Security report for gi.de

Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI) is a well-established German non-profit association dedicated to the field of informatics. The organization provides a broad range of services including membership, publications, events, and educational projects aimed at informatics professionals, academics, and students. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap, employs Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data aligns with the website's legitimacy, showing consistent domain registration without privacy protection, appropriate for a professional association. Overall, the website scores well on content quality, technical implementation, privacy compliance, and business credibility, making it a trustworthy and professional online presence for the GI association.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gi.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. holds a strong position as a leading professional association in Germany's informatics sector. Its business model focuses on non-profit membership services, educational initiatives, and knowledge dissemination through publications and events. The organization targets informatics professionals, academics, and students, fostering a community and networking ecosystem. The website's integration with partner domains and social media channels supports its outreach and engagement strategy. The absence of commercial advertising and affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit status. The association's digital presence indicates a mature and stable operation with moderate size and influence within the education and technology sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, session management via TYPO3 cookies, and a clear cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy by default denying ad personalization and storage. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Matomo analytics is privacy-friendly, and no third-party ad networks or trackers were found. Security headers were not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents or abuse reports.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
Description
Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI) is a German association focused on informatics and computer science. It provides information, publications, events, and networking opportunities for professionals and academics in the field of informatics.
Key services
Membership services, Publications and reports, Events and seminars, Networking and mentoring, Educational projects and initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap, Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of session cookies for login

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and relevant to informatics professionals.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear user options.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact likely via contact form.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of Matomo analytics with privacy-conscious default settings denying ad storage and personalization.
  7. Multiple social media channels linked including LinkedIn, YouTube, Mastodon, Bluesky.
  8. No signs of advertising or affiliate marketing.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. WHOIS data consistent with legitimate domain ownership.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and stable technology stack centered around TYPO3 CMS and Bootstrap for responsive design. It uses Matomo for analytics, configured to respect user privacy. The site is hosted on infrastructure associated with domaindiscount24.net, a known registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with compressed CSS and JS assets, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated technologies, but the absence of explicit security headers and incident response mechanisms suggests areas for technical enhancement to improve security posture and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gi.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gi.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.