Skip to main content

Security report for getterms.io

GetTerms · Technology · Iceland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GetTerms is a technology company specializing in providing data privacy compliance solutions to businesses globally. Established in 2015, it offers a suite of SaaS products including privacy policy generators, cookie consent banners, terms and conditions generators, and a consent management platform. The company targets businesses needing to comply with GDPR, CCPA, and other privacy regulations, positioning itself as a trusted and easy-to-use solution with over 500,000 customers. The website reflects a professional and user-friendly design with clear navigation and strong trust signals such as customer reviews and transparent product offerings. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, uses modern web technologies, and is hosted with reputable providers including Cloudflare for DNS. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though some security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent management. Overall, GetTerms demonstrates a mature digital presence with a strong market position in the privacy compliance niche.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of getterms.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getterms.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GetTerms operates in the technology sector, focusing on legal compliance tools for online businesses. Its business model includes subscription and lifetime purchase options, catering to a broad range of customers from small websites to SaaS and eCommerce platforms. The company leverages partnerships and affiliate programs to expand reach. Its competitive advantage lies in ease of use, comprehensive coverage of global privacy laws, and affordability compared to traditional legal services. The presence of extensive customer testimonials and a clear product roadmap indicates healthy growth and customer satisfaction. The company maintains a consistent brand image and targets a global audience, supported by multi-jurisdictional policy templates.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google Consent Mode to manage user consent, reflecting good privacy practices. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified given the business type. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Consider providing direct contact emails or phone numbers for support and security inquiries to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GetTerms
Description
GetTerms helps businesses manage cookie consent and generate compliant privacy policies, terms and conditions & more. Trusted by 500K+ Businesses.
Key services
Privacy Policy Generator, Cookie Policy Generator, Terms and Conditions Generator, Consent Management Platform, Cookie Consent Banner
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Consent Mode implemented with default denial
  • Cookie consent widget embedded

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive legal compliance tools for data privacy
  2. Strong focus on GDPR, CCPA, and other global privacy laws
  3. Multiple product offerings with clear navigation and calls to action
  4. High customer satisfaction indicated by numerous positive reviews
  5. Good technical implementation with modern web standards
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are prominently offered and integrated
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms and login portal
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end using HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and consent management. Hosting and DNS are managed via reputable providers including Cloudflare and NameCheap. The site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and well maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getterms.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getterms.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.