Skip to main content

Security report for getresponse.com

GetResponse · Technology · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GetResponse is a well-established marketing automation platform founded in 1998, headquartered in Poland. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools including email marketing, landing pages, webinars, SMS marketing, and AI-driven product recommendations. The company targets entrepreneurs, ecommerce stores, and global brands, boasting over 350,000 customers worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Next.js, React, and integration with analytics and consent management tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The missing WHOIS domain registration data slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by strong branding and external trust signals. Overall, GetResponse presents a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious platform with room for improvement in transparency around security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getresponse.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
97
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GetResponse operates in the technology and ecommerce sectors, providing SaaS marketing automation solutions. Its business model focuses on subscription-based services with scalable pricing that rewards customer success. The company leverages AI to enhance marketing effectiveness and offers integrations with over 150 third-party platforms. Its market position is strong, supported by numerous industry awards and a large, diverse customer base. The company maintains active social media channels and an affiliate program, indicating a robust marketing ecosystem. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive feature set position GetResponse competitively in the marketing automation landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent compliance. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response plan, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests an opportunity to enhance security culture and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from improved communication of security practices and incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance contact channels specifically for security incidents, including dedicated security email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain transparency about data retention and privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GetResponse S.A
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GetResponse
Description
Unlock your revenue potential with GetResponse's marketing software. Automate sales, track revenue, and convert leads into loyal customers with ease.
Key services
Email marketing, Marketing automation, Landing pages, Conversion funnels, Webinars, SMS marketing, AI product recommendations, Website builder
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), OneTrust (cookie consent), LiveChat
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer, LiveChat tracking
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging about marketing automation.
  3. Multiple trust signals including awards and customer testimonials.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust slightly.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and comprehensive.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. Use of CDN and asynchronous loading of scripts contributes to efficient content delivery. Integration with analytics and A/B testing tools like Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer indicates a data-driven approach to optimization. The site employs OneTrust for cookie consent, supporting privacy compliance. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility practices, though continuous monitoring for technical debt and modernization opportunities is advised.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getresponse.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getresponse.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.