Skip to main content

Security report for getonepass.eu

OnePass · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OnePass operates as a technology platform focused on bridging startups and investors through a trusted gateway that leverages identity verification, investment readiness scoring, and AI-powered matchmaking. The platform targets startups seeking capital and investors looking for vetted opportunities, positioning itself as a key player in the European innovation ecosystem. The business model centers on providing verified connections and streamlined deal flow, enhancing trust and efficiency in fundraising and investing processes. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including MeteorJS and React, with integration of Algolia for search capabilities and Umami for analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, supported by a professional and consistent design. Hosting and domain registration are managed through reputable providers, contributing to the platform's digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs verifiable credentials to build trust. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not publicly disclose incident response contacts or a dedicated security policy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is supported by accessible privacy and terms pages, though cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, OnePass presents a secure and professional online presence with strong business credibility. Strategic improvements in security transparency and privacy mechanisms would further enhance trust and compliance. The platform is well-positioned to serve its target audience effectively while maintaining a solid technical foundation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getonepass.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OnePass occupies a niche in the technology and finance sectors by facilitating startup-investor connections with a focus on trust and verification. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating decentralized identity technologies and AI matchmaking, which streamline the funding process and reduce risk for investors. Revenue streams likely include subscription or service fees for premium matchmaking and verification services. The target customers are startups seeking funding and investors seeking quality deal flow, primarily within the European innovation ecosystem. The company maintains partnerships with related domains such as its app, hub, and help center, indicating a growing ecosystem. Growth indicators include the promotion of free PRO trials and webinars, suggesting active user engagement and marketing efforts.

Security posture

The security posture of OnePass is solid with mandatory HTTPS and the innovative use of verifiable credentials to establish trust. The absence of common security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or abuse contact information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries in the visible content. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent is missing, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the security culture appears focused on trust and identity verification but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page including incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy controls.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance visibility of trust indicators and certifications to further boost business credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OnePass
Description
OnePass Bridge combines identity verification, investment readiness scoring, AI-powered matchmaking, and a curated network to help startups raise capital and investors discover vetted opportunities.
Key services
Identity verification with verifiable credentials, Investment readiness scoring, AI-powered matchmaking, Pitch Relay for broad investor outreach, Sourcing tools with advanced search and alerts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
MeteorJS, React, Algolia Search, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Meteor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of identity verification and verifiable credentials
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Umami
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Umami
Marketing tools
Umami analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear business focus.
  3. Strong emphasis on identity verification and trust-building.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  5. Contact information limited to email; no phone or physical address found.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and accessible.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using MeteorJS and React, enabling dynamic and responsive user experiences. Algolia integration provides efficient search capabilities, while Umami analytics offers privacy-focused user tracking. The site uses SVG graphics for scalable visuals and is hosted on infrastructure registered via GoDaddy. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical implementation is robust but could be improved by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The site’s SEO is well addressed through proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getonepass.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getonepass.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.