Skip to main content

Security report for getgems.io

Getgems · Technology · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Getgems is an NFT marketplace specializing in The Open Network (TON) blockchain, offering users the ability to create, trade, and collect NFTs with ease. Positioned as the first NFT marketplace on TON, it targets blockchain enthusiasts and NFT collectors globally. The platform features collections, raffles, offchain gift trading, and community engagement primarily via Telegram. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates analytics tools such as Yandex Metrika and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getgems.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Getgems operates in the emerging NFT marketplace sector on the TON blockchain, leveraging its first-mover advantage. Its business model revolves around facilitating NFT creation, trading, and collection, supplemented by community-driven features like raffles and offchain gift trading. The platform's revenue likely derives from transaction fees and promotional partnerships. Target customers include NFT collectors, TON blockchain users, and Telegram communities. Growth indicators include active featured collections and integration with Telegram bots. Partnerships with Telegram and use of blockchain technology enhance its ecosystem credibility. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding compliance, security transparency, and broadening market reach to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain-level protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. Analytics integration is moderate, but privacy compliance is lacking, which may expose the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and incident response preparedness to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information including security and abuse emails.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Getgems
Description
First NFT marketplace of The Open Network blockchain (TON). Create, trade and collect everything with ease.
Key services
NFT creation, NFT trading, NFT collection, Offchain gift trading, Raffles and giveaways
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Fonts, AWS DNS, Yandex Metrika, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized NFT marketplace on TON blockchain
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is protected and registered with a known registrar
  7. Content is professional and targeted at NFT and blockchain users
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging server-side rendering for performance. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates analytics via Yandex Metrika and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is on AWS as indicated by DNS servers. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of CSS. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or framework-based solution. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could be exploited. Modernization opportunities include enhancing accessibility and security compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getgems.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getgems.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.