Skip to main content

Security report for getfailsafe.com

FailSafe · Technology · Singapore

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FailSafe is a specialized security and compliance company focused on blockchain and AI technologies, offering industry-leading services such as smart contract audits, AI governance audits, AML/KYT compliance aligned with MiCA, and real-time on-chain threat monitoring for financial institutions and DeFi protocols. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for stablecoin issuers, financial institutions, DAOs, and tokenization platforms, emphasizing compliance with ISO, DORA, and MiCA frameworks. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern analytics and tracking tools, showing good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, though lacking explicit security headers and public incident response policies. The domain registration is consistent with the company's founding date and business claims, enhancing legitimacy. Overall, FailSafe demonstrates a professional and credible online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getfailsafe.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FailSafe operates in the niche intersection of blockchain security and AI governance, targeting regulated entities such as stablecoin issuers and financial institutions needing compliance with evolving regulations like MiCA and DORA. Their competitive advantage lies in combining AI and blockchain expertise with recognized compliance frameworks, offering a comprehensive suite of audits, penetration testing, and real-time monitoring. The business model is service-based, focusing on audits, compliance tooling, and security consulting. Partnerships with known entities like Immunefi and presence on major social platforms indicate a growing ecosystem. The company is relatively new (founded 2023) but has established a credible market position through targeted services and compliance focus.

Security posture

FailSafe exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of reCAPTCHA for form protection, and Cloudflare DNS services. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The company aligns with multiple security frameworks (ISO 27001, ISO 42001, DORA, MiCA), indicating strong internal security governance. The website could enhance transparency by publishing security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved in external communication and header hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) on the website.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FailSafe
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FailSafe
Description
FailSafe is the leading security and compliance frameworks for AI governance, DeFi and Stablecoins. FailSafe covers regulatory demands across ISO, AI governance and DORA/MiCA frameworks.
Key services
Smart Contract Audits, AI Governance Audits, MiCA-Compliant AML & KYT, DORA-Ready Onchain Risk Monitoring, Penetration Testing, Treasury Security via Co-Signer
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 24165, DORA, MiCA
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Focus on blockchain, AI security, and compliance services
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  4. Contact available via form and physical address in Singapore
  5. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools without explicit cookie consent
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Domain is new but consistent with company founding date
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for analytics. It uses Cloudflare for DNS services and GoDaddy as the domain registrar. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business size and scope. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getfailsafe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getfailsafe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.