Skip to main content

Security report for getawesomestudio.com

WPoets Technology LLP · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Awesome Studio Platform is a WordPress plugin and rapid development framework designed to accelerate website creation using reusable modules, JavaScript integrations, and an HTML/CSS layer that reduces the need for PHP coding. The company behind it, WPoets Technology LLP, has been operating since 2015 and targets WordPress developers and agencies seeking efficient site assembly tools. The website demonstrates a professional design with clear navigation, portfolio showcases, and blog content, reflecting a good level of digital maturity. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and SPA architecture, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and uses HTTPS for secure communication. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for security improvements. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getawesomestudio.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress plugin development with a niche in rapid prototyping and site assembly. Its business model revolves around providing a GPL-licensed framework and supporting documentation to empower developers. The company maintains a small size with a consistent brand presence and active social media channels. The market position is specialized, catering to WordPress professionals who value speed and flexibility. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for digital engagement via forms and social media. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or related domains were identified. Growth indicators include ongoing blog updates and portfolio showcases.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency in handling security events. The site uses modern libraries but does not indicate vulnerability management practices. Forms are present but no explicit mention of secure input handling or CAPTCHA mechanisms. The security score reflects moderate maturity with recommendations to enhance DNS security, implement security headers, and publish security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including security incident contacts, to improve transparency and responsiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WPoets Technology LLP
Description
Awesome Studio is a highly flexible WordPress plugin and rapid development framework designed to help users create beautiful WordPress sites and applications faster. It offers reusable modules, integration with popular JavaScript libraries, an HTML/CSS layer for advanced site building without PHP coding, and supports popular WordPress plugins like WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, and WPML.
Key services
Reusable modules for WordPress, Integration with JavaScript libraries, HTML/CSS site building tools, Support for popular WordPress plugins, Comprehensive documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.6, FontAwesome 4.4.0, Swiper 3.3.1, Masonry, Moment.js, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Awesome Studio WordPress Framework, SPA architecture
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Sharrre social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based platform promoting a WordPress plugin/framework.
  2. Content is rich with features, blog posts, and portfolio examples.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage or footer.
  4. Contact is primarily via contact page and social media links.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and SPA architecture.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Domain is well aged and registered with reputable registrar.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom framework called Awesome Studio, integrating multiple JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, and Masonry. It uses a SPA architecture for dynamic content loading. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, and assets are loaded from CDNs like cdnjs.cloudflare.com. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated libraries and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getawesomestudio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getawesomestudio.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.