Skip to main content

Security report for geomatex.com

Geomatex Integrated Solutions · Technology · Egypt

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geomatex Integrated Solutions is a specialized geo-intelligence system integrator based in Egypt, focusing on reality modelling applications that serve CAD, GIS, BIM, and Digital Twin technologies. The company positions itself as a regional leader with a highly experienced team offering key services such as As-Built Documentation, Ground Penetrating Radar, Drone Services, and 3D laser scanning. Their target audience includes clients across various sectors requiring advanced geo-intelligence solutions. Technically, the website employs common web technologies like jQuery and Bootstrap but suffers from slow performance and lacks modern security configurations. The SSL certificate is invalid, and no advanced security headers or DNS protections are in place, exposing the site to potential risks. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanisms detected and only a basic privacy policy present. Overall, the business demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires significant improvements in security and privacy to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geomatex.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geomatex operates as a small technology-focused company specializing in geo-intelligence and reality modelling system integration. Their business model revolves around providing specialized services and solutions to sectors requiring CAD, GIS, BIM, and digital twin capabilities. The company maintains an active social media presence and partners with MultiMega corporation, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts and product offerings related to geo-intelligence technologies. Growth indicators include a diverse product catalog and service portfolio. However, the website's slow performance and lack of advanced digital marketing or analytics tools suggest room for digital transformation to better capture market opportunities.

Security posture

The current security posture of geomatex.com is weak. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support expose users to data interception risks. Missing security headers and DNS protections such as DNSSEC and CAA records further weaken domain security. The DMARC policy is set to none, indicating no enforcement of email authentication, which could lead to phishing risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or GDPR-aligned policies detected. These gaps present significant compliance and operational risks, especially for a technology service provider handling potentially sensitive client data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic and enable HTTPS with modern protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3).
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to protect domain integrity and certificate issuance.
  4. Develop and publish a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact channels for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap (versions 3 and 4), Font Awesome, and Slick Slider for UI components. Google Fonts are used for typography. Hosting is provided by Hetzner Online GmbH, indicated by the IP address. The site suffers from slow load times (over 14 seconds) and a large page size (~2.8MB), which negatively impacts user experience and SEO. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or legacy build. The lack of structured data and modern SEO practices limits search engine visibility. Technical debt is evident in mixed Bootstrap versions and missing security configurations, indicating opportunities for modernization and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geomatex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geomatex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.