Skip to main content

Security report for geoglatt.ch

Technology · Switzerland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website geoglatt.ch/global-protect/login.esp serves as a GlobalProtect VPN login portal, primarily targeting corporate users requiring secure remote access. The portal is designed to authenticate users via username, password, and importantly, a valid client certificate, indicating a focus on secure access control. The site’s content is minimal and functional, lacking broader business or marketing information, privacy policies, or contact details, which limits transparency and user trust signals. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap for layout and responsiveness. While the site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No content management system or hosting provider information is discernible from the page. From a security perspective, the portal enforces client certificate validation and includes a CSRF token in the login form, which are positive controls. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers, multi-factor authentication, CAPTCHA, or bot protection mechanisms suggests room for improvement. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which may raise compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. Overall, the site functions as a secure access point but lacks comprehensive business, privacy, and security disclosures. Strategic improvements in security headers, multi-factor authentication, privacy compliance, and user trust indicators are recommended to enhance the portal’s security posture and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geoglatt.ch

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal is a specialized access point for GlobalProtect VPN users, likely serving an enterprise or organizational environment in Switzerland. Its business model centers on providing secure remote network access rather than direct customer engagement or e-commerce. The lack of public-facing business information, contact details, or marketing content suggests it is an internal or partner-facing service. There are no visible partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company references on the page. The portal’s competitive advantage lies in leveraging Palo Alto Networks’ GlobalProtect technology for secure connectivity. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the page content.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate, with key strengths including client certificate enforcement and CSRF token usage. However, the absence of HTTP security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security), lack of multi-factor authentication, and no visible bot mitigation measures represent vulnerabilities that could be exploited. The portal does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, but error messages and password handling could be improved to prevent information leakage. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, limiting transparency and responsiveness to security events.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Introduce multi-factor authentication to strengthen user verification beyond passwords and certificates.
  3. Add CAPTCHA or other bot detection mechanisms to prevent automated login attempts.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is a login portal for GlobalProtect, a VPN/security gateway product by Palo Alto Networks, used for secure remote access.
Key services
User authentication, VPN access, Client certificate validation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Client certificate required for login
  • CSRF token present in form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. The page is a login portal for GlobalProtect VPN service.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present on this page.
  3. No contact information or business details are provided on this page.
  4. The page requires a valid client certificate for login, indicating a secure access mechanism.
  5. No external links or social media links are present.
  6. The site uses standard web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No security headers visible in the HTML content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. Content is minimal and focused solely on authentication.
Technical notes

Notes

The portal uses a straightforward technology stack with Bootstrap and jQuery for UI and interactivity. The HTML structure is valid but minimal, with some inline JavaScript handling form behavior and client certificate validation messaging. Performance is likely moderate given the limited content and standard libraries. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO and accessibility features are minimal or absent. No CMS or hosting details are identifiable. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools, indicating a focus on functionality over user engagement or tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geoglatt.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geoglatt.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.