Skip to main content

Security report for generatordomen.pl

Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website generatordomen.pl offers a domain name generation service targeted primarily at Polish-speaking users seeking inspiration for registering internet domain names. The service operates as a simple web application where users input descriptions of their intended website content, and the system suggests suitable domain names. The business appears to be a small-scale technology service founded in 2017, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The website is straightforward, with a clean and consistent branding approach, and content quality is good for its niche purpose. From a technical perspective, the site uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without any detected frameworks or CMS. It is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The site is served over HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a good baseline for security. However, no advanced security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which limits compliance and trust. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing contact information for incident response. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the domain registration details align well with the website's market and language, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its purpose but lacks several compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance its credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching generatordomen.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Generatordomen.pl occupies a niche in the Polish market as a domain name suggestion tool, catering to individuals and small businesses looking for domain registration ideas. Its competitive advantage lies in its simplicity and language-specific focus. The business model is service-oriented, likely monetized through domain registrations or affiliate partnerships, though no direct monetization is visible on the site. The target customers are Polish-speaking entrepreneurs and website creators. Growth potential depends on expanding features and improving compliance. The lack of visible partnerships or certifications suggests a standalone operation with limited ecosystem integration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, which protects data in transit and DNS integrity. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact information. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, security practices are minimal but adequate for a low-risk informational tool. Enhancements in policy transparency and header implementation are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update JavaScript and server configurations to maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A web application that generates domain name suggestions based on user input describing website content, goods, or services.
Key services
Domain name generation based on user input
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple, focused tool for domain name generation in Polish.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or company details provided on the site.
  4. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  5. Site uses basic JavaScript for form submission and UI interaction.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS and DNSSEC are enabled.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) without reliance on frameworks or CMS, which reduces complexity but limits scalability. The site is mobile responsive and uses separate CSS files for desktop and mobile views. Performance is moderate with no heavy external dependencies. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clean and navigable structure. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adopting modern frameworks and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with generatordomen.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review generatordomen.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.