Skip to main content

Security report for gemmebacon.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GemmeBacon.com is a small personal website focused on technology content, specifically daily CPU posts and related topics. The site serves a general audience interested in technology and gaming, providing links to various related resources and personal content. The business model appears to be content creation and personal sharing without commercial transactions or formal business operations. The website is relatively new, founded in 2023, and hosted using Cloudflare services for DNS and CDN. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with minimal frameworks or CMS detected. It includes Cloudflare Insights for analytics but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, or performance optimizations. Mobile optimization is basic, and the site structure is simple but navigable. Security measures include HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are present. From a security perspective, the site has a moderate posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of formal contact information, and missing security headers represent compliance and security gaps. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's nature and age, registered via a reputable registrar without privacy protection, which aligns with the site's personal use. Overall, the site is safe and appropriate for general audiences but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, enhanced security headers, and more professional contact mechanisms to increase trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gemmebacon.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gemmebacon.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gemmebacon.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal or hobbyist platform focusing on technology content, particularly daily CPU posts and related media. It targets technology enthusiasts and gamers, providing curated content and links to partner or related sites. The business model is non-commercial, relying on content sharing rather than direct revenue streams. The site shows moderate branding consistency and basic content quality, indicating a small-scale operation without formal business infrastructure. Partnerships appear informal, with linked domains suggesting personal or community connections rather than corporate relationships. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's personal nature and lack of commercial features.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protection is enabled, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and formal privacy or cookie policies indicates gaps in security best practices and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site uses Cloudflare Insights for minimal analytics tracking without extensive user profiling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but insufficient for commercial or sensitive data handling environments.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Provide formal contact information such as a company email or contact form to improve communication and incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update website security measures and WHOIS data to maintain trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
GemmeBacon's official website. I do daily CPUs and other stuff here.
Key services
daily CPU posts, YouTube content, downloads, miscellaneous personal content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Cloudflare Insights script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal or hobbyist site focused on daily CPU posts and related content.
  2. No formal privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact method is informal via Discord username only.
  4. No forms or email addresses found for direct contact.
  5. Site uses Cloudflare DNS and CDN with basic security measures.
  6. No advanced security headers or compliance indicators present.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  8. Site design and content quality are basic but functional.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, without detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, which provides some performance and security benefits. The site includes a Cloudflare Insights script for analytics but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is present but basic. The site performance is moderate, with no evident broken elements or errors. Technical debt appears low due to the site's simplicity, but modernization opportunities include adding security headers, improving SEO metadata, and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gemmebacon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gemmebacon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.