Skip to main content

Security report for gem-stats.de

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gem-stats.de is a Matomo analytics platform login page, providing a free and open-source web analytics service. It primarily serves website administrators or analytics users who want to access detailed visitor data. The platform is positioned as a privacy-focused alternative to other analytics services, emphasizing data control and compliance. The site content is minimal, focusing on user authentication and analytics configuration rather than public-facing business information. Technically, the site uses the Matomo platform with JavaScript and PHP, hosted on cloudpit infrastructure, and enforces HTTPS for secure communications. Security posture is adequate with no exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities detected in the provided content, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited on this page, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or contact information, which may be available elsewhere on the full site. Overall, the site is functional and secure for its purpose but lacks public business transparency and detailed compliance disclosures on this page.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gem-stats.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gem-stats.de operates as a technology service provider offering web analytics through the Matomo platform. Its market positioning is as an open-source, privacy-conscious analytics solution targeting website owners and administrators. The business model likely revolves around providing analytics software, possibly with premium features or services. The target audience includes webmasters and organizations seeking control over their analytics data. The site does not publicly disclose detailed company information, partnerships, or subsidiaries on this page. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not evident from the content provided. The hosting on cloudpit suggests reliance on professional infrastructure providers.

Security posture

The security posture of gem-stats.de is moderate to good. The site enforces HTTPS, uses token-based authentication with anonymous tokens for public access, and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and no explicit incident response or security policies are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies on this page is a compliance gap. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures or security certifications. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, documented incident response procedures, and visible privacy compliance measures to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider enabling two-factor authentication for administrative access to strengthen account security.
  5. Regularly audit and update the technology stack and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
free/libre analytics platform
Key services
web analytics, visitor tracking, data privacy management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo analytics platform, JavaScript, PHP
Frameworks
Matomo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • token_auth set to anonymous for public access
  • no exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo tracking
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Matomo analytics platform login page.
  2. No public business contact information or policies found on this page.
  3. Content is minimal and focused on user login for analytics.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the HTML content.
  5. No external marketing or advertising detected beyond Matomo platform usage.
  6. Site uses HTTPS and appears to follow basic security practices.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with hosting provider.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on the Matomo analytics platform, leveraging JavaScript and PHP technologies. It is hosted on cloudpit nameservers, indicating professional hosting infrastructure. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted data transmission. The HTML content is minimal and focused on login functionality, with embedded JavaScript for analytics tracking. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta descriptions and public content. There is no CMS detected beyond the Matomo platform itself. The site does not appear to use third-party advertising or affiliate marketing tools. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for an analytics login portal but could be enhanced with better SEO, accessibility, and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gem-stats.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gem-stats.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.