Skip to main content

Security report for gdata.pl

G DATA Software Sp. z o.o. · Technology · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

G DATA Software Sp. z o.o. is a well-established Polish company specializing in antivirus and IT security software solutions for both businesses and individual users. Founded in 1995, the company boasts a long history and a strong market position as a leading provider of cybersecurity products. Their website, gdata.pl, reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, offering a range of security products and services with clear branding and consistent messaging. The company targets a broad audience including small to medium enterprises and private customers, emphasizing protection against internet threats and hacking attacks. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, SalesManago, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO optimization, mobile responsiveness, and moderate performance. Privacy compliance is well addressed with explicit privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and employs cookie consent to manage tracking. However, some security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information published. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were found, indicating a solid security posture but with room for improvement in transparency and formal security documentation. Overall, gdata.pl presents a trustworthy and professional online presence consistent with its business claims. The domain's long age and WHOIS data support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, and considering a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gdata.pl

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
88
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

G DATA operates in the competitive cybersecurity market with a focus on antivirus software and IT security solutions. Their business model centers on software sales and service provision to a diverse customer base including SMEs and individual users. The company leverages its long-standing history and innovation legacy as a competitive advantage. The website's multilingual alternate links indicate a broad international presence. Marketing efforts include integration with SalesManago and social media channels, supporting customer engagement and lead generation. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation. The company maintains a moderate size with 11-50 employees, positioning it as a specialized technology provider in Poland and beyond.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and good SSL configuration. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency and user trust in case of incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external security collaboration. Overall, the site is secure for users but could benefit from enhanced security documentation and header implementation to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit privacy compliance mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR adherence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G DATA Software Sp. z o.o.
Description
W 1987 roku opracowaliśmy pierwsze na świecie oprogramowanie antywirusowe. Dzięki doświadczeniu i innowacyjności zapewniamy dziś bezpieczeństwo małym, dużym i średnim przedsiębiorstwom, infrastrukturze krytycznej oraz milionom klientów prywatnych na całym świecie. Dzięki szerokiej gamie rozwiązań zabezpieczających i mechanizmom ochrony, zapewniamy bezpieczeństwo przed ponad 600 milionami złośliwych plików. Jesteśmy i pozostajemy niezależni od instytucji politycznych. Nasze oprogramowanie jest najlepszym wyborem dla bezpieczeństwa Państwa systemów: nasze wysokie wskaźniki wykrywalności są stale potwierdzane przez niezależne instytuty badawcze.
Key services
antivirus software, IT security solutions, protection for businesses, protection for individual users
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, ShopEngine, Google Tag Manager, SalesManago, Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Yoast SEO Premium
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with consent mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, SalesManago
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, SalesManago
Marketing tools
SalesManago, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Comprehensive business information and structured data present.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. Good integration of analytics and marketing tools with privacy compliance.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform enhanced with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Elementor for page building. It uses several plugins including ShopEngine and Yoast SEO Premium to optimize user experience and search engine visibility. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and SalesManago, all managed with user consent via Cookiebot. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content analyzed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gdata.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gdata.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.