Skip to main content

Security report for gattaca.com

Gattaca · Technology · United Kingdom

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gattaca is a small, London-based crypto technology company specializing in building trading and MEV-related infrastructure and services within the crypto transaction supply chain. The website provides minimal content focused on business description and a single contact email, indicating a niche and focused business model. The market position appears to be that of a specialized technology infrastructure provider serving crypto trading entities. Technically, the website is very basic, built with simple HTML and minimal styling, lacking modern frameworks, CMS, or advanced technical features. There is no evidence of analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks SEO optimization and structured metadata. From a security perspective, the site does not display security headers or policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of HTTPS information and security best practices lowers the security posture score. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the site would benefit from improved security configurations and compliance documentation. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile but lacks maturity in privacy, security, and technical sophistication. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy compliance, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and operational resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gattaca.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gattaca operates in the crypto technology sector with a focus on transaction supply chain infrastructure and MEV-related services. The company targets crypto traders and blockchain infrastructure users, positioning itself as a specialized technology provider. The business model centers on delivering infrastructure solutions rather than consumer-facing products. The limited public information and absence of detailed corporate data suggest a small-sized enterprise with a focused market niche. No partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The company maintains a professional contact email and a verified domain, indicating basic operational legitimacy. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly available, limiting deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no published security or incident response policies. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files indicates limited transparency in security management. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit interaction. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated through policy documents. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics that could raise privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Enhance website technical infrastructure with modern frameworks and improve accessibility and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gattaca
Description
Gattaca is a research-driven crypto technology company based in London with deep experience across the transaction supply chain, primarily focused on building trading and MEV related infrastructure and services.
Key services
trading infrastructure, MEV related infrastructure, crypto transaction supply chain services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and primarily informational.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  5. No external links or social media profiles found.
  6. No scripts or third-party libraries detected in the HTML.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations visible.
  8. Website uses a simple HTML structure with inline styles.
  9. No analytics or tracking technologies detected.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is constructed with basic HTML and minimal inline CSS, lacking modern web development frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or external scripts are detected, indicating a static site with limited interactivity. The absence of meta tags beyond charset and a Google site verification tag suggests minimal SEO optimization. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Performance is likely moderate due to simplicity but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, semantic HTML, and integration of analytics and security features to improve user experience and operational robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gattaca.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gattaca.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.