Skip to main content

Security report for galileu.net

GELILEU S.L. · Technology · Spain

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GALILEU.net is a small technology service provider based in Girona, Spain, specializing in internet services including web design, development, online marketing, hosting, and digital transformation support for SMEs. The company acts as an agent for the Kit Digital program, helping local businesses access European digitalization funds. The website content is well-structured and bilingual (Catalan and Spanish), targeting regional SMEs and autonomous professionals. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.8.3 and jQuery UI 1.9.1, along with the fullPage.js framework for navigation. While the site is accessible and functional, it lacks modern security headers and up-to-date libraries, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but no privacy or security policies are published, indicating gaps in compliance. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the active website presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galileu.net

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GALILEU.net operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital services for SMEs in Catalan-speaking regions and Spain. Its business model revolves around providing internet services and acting as a digital agent for government-backed programs like Kit Digital. The company leverages local market knowledge and regional language to position itself as a trusted partner for digital transformation. The presence of client testimonials and clear contact information supports credibility. However, the lack of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggests a modest digital footprint. The company appears to be small-sized, founded in 1999, with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary relationships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS presumably enabled (based on base href https://), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.8.3 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. Cookie consent is implemented, but no privacy or incident response policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues that could affect trust and security. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring updates to libraries, implementation of security headers, and publication of privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and security policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GELILEU S.L.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GELILEU S.L.
Description
GALILEU.net is an internet services studio based in Girona, Spain, known for improving usability and user experience on the web. It acts as a digital agent for the Kit Digital program supporting SMEs with digital transformation, offering web design, development, marketing, hosting, and booking management services.
Key services
Digital agent for Kit Digital program, Web design and development, Online marketing, Hosting and email services, Booking system integration
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, jQuery UI 1.9.1, jquery.fullPage.js, Google Fonts (Raleway, Sedgwick Ave)
Frameworks
fullPage.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Catalan and Spanish.
  2. No privacy policy page found; cookie consent implemented but minimal.
  3. No security or incident response policies published.
  4. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with company details.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No forms present on the website for data collection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic jQuery-based tech stack with fullPage.js for navigation and Google Fonts for typography. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive CSS for tablets and mobile devices, though mobile optimization is basic. Performance is moderate due to older libraries and synchronous script loading. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features beyond basic meta tags. No analytics scripts are active, as Google Analytics code is commented out. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via JavaScript and cookies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galileu.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galileu.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.