Skip to main content

Security report for galenupamatskola.lv

Galēnu pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galēnu pamatskola is an educational institution likely serving as a primary school in Latvia, as indicated by the Latvian language and domain. The website is built on WordPress and contains minimal content, primarily a default blog post welcoming visitors. The site targets local community members such as parents and students, providing basic information and updates. The business model is informational and educational, with no evident commercial activities. Technically, the site uses standard WordPress infrastructure with modern fonts and scripts but lacks advanced performance or SEO optimizations. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no advanced security headers or policies visible. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms policies indicates low compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting user trust and engagement. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic, with room for significant improvements in security, compliance, and content richness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galenupamatskola.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small educational entity focused on local service delivery. It lacks detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals. The minimal content and absence of contact details suggest a low digital maturity level. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or advanced business models. The site does not appear to engage in advertising or analytics tracking, indicating a low commercial focus. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are not discernible from the current content. The site serves primarily as a digital presence for the school rather than a comprehensive business platform.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are present, which limits preparedness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR, which is critical for websites operating in the EU. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the site requires enhancements in security best practices and compliance to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear contact information and security incident response details to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galēnu pamatskola
Description
Galēnu pamatskola appears to be an educational institution, likely a primary school based in Latvia, as indicated by the Latvian language and the domain country code. The website contains a blog with a default WordPress post welcoming visitors.
Key services
Education, Information dissemination via blog
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational site for a Latvian primary school.
  2. Content is minimal and mostly default WordPress placeholder content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the site.
  5. No security or incident response policies visible.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security headers detected.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Twenty Twenty-Five theme. It uses modern web fonts (Manrope, Fira Code) and standard JavaScript libraries for emoji support and navigation. The site is mobile responsive and uses semantic HTML5 elements. Performance appears moderate with no heavy scripts or external dependencies beyond WordPress core assets. SEO is basic with meta viewport and robots tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features include skip links and screen reader text. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed. The site does not use advanced frameworks or CDNs beyond WordPress defaults. Overall, the technical implementation is standard but could benefit from SEO enhancements and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galenupamatskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galenupamatskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.