Skip to main content

Security report for galaktika.lv

Bērnudārzs «Galaktika» · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bērnudārzs Galaktika is a private kindergarten located in Jūrmala, Latvia, serving children aged approximately 1.5 to 7 years. Established in 2006, it offers a unique educational program with three age-specific groups, emphasizing modern pedagogical methods and a nurturing environment. The website presents a professional image with clear information about services, groups, and contact details, targeting parents seeking quality early childhood education. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, though accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, slightly impacting trust but the business appears legitimate based on content and contact information. Overall, the website is functional, informative, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galaktika.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Galaktika operates in the education sector as a small private kindergarten with a niche market in Jūrmala, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique location near the sea, small group sizes, and experienced staff. The business model is fee-based childcare and education services. The website indicates a stable operation since 2006 with a loyal customer base evidenced by parent testimonials. The company maintains social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, supporting community engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business focuses on quality and personalized care rather than scale. Growth opportunities may include enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements. Partnerships or related domains are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. Forms include client-side validation but lack advanced protections like CAPTCHA or bot mitigation. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, with no visible cookie consent banner, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit privacy notices to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies including contact information for reporting issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and ensure up-to-date security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bērnudārzs «Galaktika»
Description
Privāts bērnudārzs Galaktika Jūrmalā, Majoru rajonā, piedāvā izglītības programmu bērniem no 1 gada 7 mēnešiem līdz 7 gadiem ar trīs vecuma grupām. Uzsākts 2006. gadā, ar profesionālu pedagogu komandu un mūsdienīgu aprīkojumu.
Key services
Izglītības programmas bērniem, Ēdināšana ar sabalansētām ēdienreizēm, Trīs vecuma grupas bērniem, Izmēģinājuma nedēļas reģistrācija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Fonts (Ubuntu), Google Analytics, jQuery (implied by script usage), Novi Builder (CSS/JS naming)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the private kindergarten services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; registrant info unknown.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and physical address in Jūrmala, Latvia.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Forms include validation but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences, focused on children and parents.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap framework with custom CSS and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with a clean navigation structure. Performance is moderate with some use of parallax and animations that may impact load times. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the source. The site uses standard HTML5 and JavaScript with client-side form validation. There is no evidence of advanced backend technologies or APIs. Technical debt appears low but opportunities exist to improve SEO and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs adequately but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galaktika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galaktika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.