Skip to main content

Security report for g.works

G-Works Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

G-Works Oy is a Finnish digital agency specializing in designing, implementing, and maintaining websites, e-commerce stores, and custom digital systems with over 15 years of experience. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking tailored digital solutions and positions itself as a reliable and professional service provider in the Finnish technology sector. Their website reflects a modern, professional design with clear navigation and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, and employs Cloudflare DNS services. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with good SEO practices in place. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, uses appropriate security headers, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, demonstrating good GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain registration, matching the company’s location and business claims. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching g.works

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

G-Works operates as a small-sized technology service provider focused on digital solutions including web development, e-commerce, and custom software systems. Their business model revolves around service delivery to other businesses, emphasizing customization and ongoing maintenance. The company leverages a partnership ecosystem including Google for analytics and advertising, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Their market position is strengthened by a long operational history and positive client testimonials. Revenue streams likely include project-based development, maintenance contracts, and branding services. The target customer segment includes Finnish businesses requiring digital transformation and online presence enhancement. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality, compliance, and customer trust as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and no visible security misconfigurations or vulnerabilities. The use of Cookiebot for granular cookie consent management indicates strong privacy and compliance awareness. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents an area for improvement. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which could enhance DNS security. Overall, the security maturity is good, with recommendations to formalize security policies and incident response processes to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  3. Add incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G-Works Oy
Description
Suunnittelemme, toteutamme ja ylläpidämme verkkosivustoja, verkkokauppoja ja räätälöityjä järjestelmiä 15 vuoden kokemuksella.
Key services
Websites, E-commerce stores, Custom digital systems, Website maintenance and support (Respa), Brand identity design, Marketing materials
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot (consent management), Vercel analytics
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Google Ads conversion tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond privacy policy
  4. No visible terms of service or incident response contacts
  5. Professional and modern website design with clear navigation
  6. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on Vercel
  7. Good GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy
  8. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected
  9. WHOIS data consistent with business claims and location
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, and uses Cloudflare for DNS. It employs Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Vercel analytics for performance monitoring. The site is well-optimized for speed, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with valid HTML and CSS. The use of preloading and optimized images indicates attention to performance. No technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance DNS security with DNSSEC and to formalize security and compliance documentation. The technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable digital presence aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with g.works. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review g.works.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.